It's always (d)ifferent for them. Their arguments change like the weather, and as volatile as an active volcano amidst an earthquake or a neutron star.
Just ask them a simple hypothetical: "Climate change is fixed and Trump wins the Presidency, or Kamala wins and everything stays the same" and you'll watch them trip over themselves to rationalize why Kamala must win.
Because it's not about that. It's a talking point that they were conditioned to regurgitate at any cost.
We've been able to manipulate storms since the '40s IIRC.
What we can NOT change is the climate.
Weather and climate are two very, very different things.
It's always (d)ifferent for them. Their arguments change like the weather, and as volatile as an active volcano amidst an earthquake or a neutron star.
Just ask them a simple hypothetical: "Climate change is fixed and Trump wins the Presidency, or Kamala wins and everything stays the same" and you'll watch them trip over themselves to rationalize why Kamala must win.
Because it's not about that. It's a talking point that they were conditioned to regurgitate at any cost.
Doesn't pachydermal flatus cause climate change?
Is that a fart? Swalwell is killing us!!!
u/#fart
That won the internet when came out!!!! 🤣
I don't sweat hurricanes. But the idea of Swalwell farts has me shaking in fear.
My dog has been quivering under the table since I made that comment. I must have said it out loud as I was writing it.
The other elephant in the room
https://old.reddit.com/r/conspiracy/comments/dxuw52/the_elephant_in_the_room/
The elephant in the room: https://cdn.vox-cdn.com/thumbor/fyHLmT1mGZ7wqFNPIaYgytLfWno=/0x0:5320x3540/1200x800/filters:focal(3035x444:3885x1294)/cdn.vox-cdn.com/uploads/chorus_image/image/63700268/1142005332.jpg.0.jpg
When a huge storm did a u-turn away from New York on 9-11
So True!
It was a good attempt, however, their solution to 'warming' is to address indirectly, not to change the weather directly.