Already been done... They're not getting translated and we here don't search in other languages. Look for OrwellCity who translates La Quinta Columna. They've been tracking graphene oxide in foods and in the environment since before the plandemic, its response in blood to external radiation (like 5g), and its increased damage to blood cells in acidic systems (like athletes who produce lactic acid in high amounts and then keel over). When they could obtain vials of vaccines, they observed them and found self-assembling structures that reacted to heat, light and radiation.
The MAC address phenomenon has been reposted, which was discovered early on in in Europe. Regular people found it and very scientifically isolated themselves and diligently eliminated all possible sources of the new signals. Then mainstream apps suddenly were changed to make it harder to open-search devices from phones. But you can wait for a white coat in a lab full of devices to confirm in a peer reviewed paper.
The last claim about graphene oxide that had anymore more than people claiming “graphene oxide!!!” in was complete misdirection/false flag. It used a description of a preparation technique for electron microscopy as evidence of graphene oxide in the jabs.
As for “tracking graphene oxide in foods” i would like to know how they track it, because the means of testing aren’t the most sensitive techniques and very costly. You need multiple approaches to differentiate from other sources of carbon.
Not saying it’s not possible, but you need more than a microscope.
Already been done... They're not getting translated and we here don't search in other languages. Look for OrwellCity who translates La Quinta Columna. They've been tracking graphene oxide in foods and in the environment since before the plandemic, its response in blood to external radiation (like 5g), and its increased damage to blood cells in acidic systems (like athletes who produce lactic acid in high amounts and then keel over). When they could obtain vials of vaccines, they observed them and found self-assembling structures that reacted to heat, light and radiation.
The MAC address phenomenon has been reposted, which was discovered early on in in Europe. Regular people found it and very scientifically isolated themselves and diligently eliminated all possible sources of the new signals. Then mainstream apps suddenly were changed to make it harder to open-search devices from phones. But you can wait for a white coat in a lab full of devices to confirm in a peer reviewed paper.
I tested Mac address phenomenon myself multiple times in multiple locations. Didn't find anything.
might be something with different batches? i dunno this whole damn thing could just be a distraction.
The last claim about graphene oxide that had anymore more than people claiming “graphene oxide!!!” in was complete misdirection/false flag. It used a description of a preparation technique for electron microscopy as evidence of graphene oxide in the jabs.
As for “tracking graphene oxide in foods” i would like to know how they track it, because the means of testing aren’t the most sensitive techniques and very costly. You need multiple approaches to differentiate from other sources of carbon.
Not saying it’s not possible, but you need more than a microscope.