It is obvious that you have NOT read her work...she is very meticulous in her work, sharing all the things you have mentioned. She is a very intelligent researcher...asking the right questions and not stopping until she finds the answer.
Thank you for the mini lecture on "true science"...I had NO clue...
I’m sorry it came off as lecturing, and maybe it was (didn’t re-read just now, but it’s one reason I will often edit a lot of my posts after writing them) but note that I didn’t intend it that way, and was stating that from not having seen it available.
You are correct, I didn’t know of or read those things, and was commenting from the information I have, which you are also correct didn’t go into any papers or know where they are at. I didn’t see them cited here, or know where they might be.
There are a lot of things presented in the way that I stated, though, and while it can result in this reaction, justifiably, I do try and go back to the “dumb underlying requirements”, as people often miss them, myself included. Not trying to imply that anyone didn’t know them, just to be sure it isn’t missed, out of my own having not seen it.
Autistic information review and such - also I tend toward broad associative research and reasoning, and not deep, specific research, though I’ll occasionally dive to mid-deep levels.
Her research will open your eyes to things you couldn't have imagined even 30 years ago. I have never regretted a video I watched or paper I have read when it was from Dr. Mihalcea...give her a try...you might be pleasantly surprised and MUCH more informed. I am of the opinion science can be a help or a hindrance...depending on what people want you to believe. Dr. Mihalcea has all the right intentions/research and that is so valuable in the world today.
It is obvious that you have NOT read her work...she is very meticulous in her work, sharing all the things you have mentioned. She is a very intelligent researcher...asking the right questions and not stopping until she finds the answer. Thank you for the mini lecture on "true science"...I had NO clue...
I’m sorry it came off as lecturing, and maybe it was (didn’t re-read just now, but it’s one reason I will often edit a lot of my posts after writing them) but note that I didn’t intend it that way, and was stating that from not having seen it available.
You are correct, I didn’t know of or read those things, and was commenting from the information I have, which you are also correct didn’t go into any papers or know where they are at. I didn’t see them cited here, or know where they might be.
There are a lot of things presented in the way that I stated, though, and while it can result in this reaction, justifiably, I do try and go back to the “dumb underlying requirements”, as people often miss them, myself included. Not trying to imply that anyone didn’t know them, just to be sure it isn’t missed, out of my own having not seen it.
Autistic information review and such - also I tend toward broad associative research and reasoning, and not deep, specific research, though I’ll occasionally dive to mid-deep levels.
Her research will open your eyes to things you couldn't have imagined even 30 years ago. I have never regretted a video I watched or paper I have read when it was from Dr. Mihalcea...give her a try...you might be pleasantly surprised and MUCH more informed. I am of the opinion science can be a help or a hindrance...depending on what people want you to believe. Dr. Mihalcea has all the right intentions/research and that is so valuable in the world today.