If she's a witness/victim-survivor, that's one thing. Typically, however, witnesses in a criminal investigation never, and I mean NEVER are told about impending arrests, indictments, etc. Give this a healthy dose of salt grains before you devour her info. As glad as I would be to see this actually happen, no prosecutor in their right mind would ever divulge the kind of info she says she's privy to. And even if one did divulge info to her, there would be a gag order in place to prevent that person from saying anything that would jeopardize the investigation.

Seems to me people around here are just so excited and ready to see happenings, that they'll forget about certain rules we have developed as the premier anon community. Rules such as "the 48-72 hr rule," the "do your due diligence rule," and the "post nothing unless you can independently confirm it rule."

Since the sticky has been removed, I'll go on ahead and consider this as bunk news until we see how it plays out over the next 38-62 hrs.

Last thought on this:

I'm beginning to think this place has either been captured by certain elements and those elements are trying their best to distract, divide, and divert attention away from more critical issues we should be dealing with, or people around her behave become complacent and bored with the pace of things we've been told are happening, and their minds are making leaps of faith in their judgements and thoughts. Leaps of faith in a logic process cannot be allowed. It's what leads to failed ops. Leaps of faith in the logic process is what special warfare operators call bad intelligence. I'm not calling out any one anon, or the mod team, or the contributors with this thought, just pointing out that things around here now seem a little off. I'm a suspicious person by nature, so what I'm seeing now makes me wonder about just "who" exactly is in charge here and where the funding comes from for this site.