Yes but the fake printed ones will all have the same serial number/water mark number, if there is one. So if A Court letβs a case through, that piece of evidence would be prudent in proving fraud.
My latest thoughts have been. We go through the election. There is enough fuckery that it takes a while to sort through. We have more and better evidence than we did before. We have braver judges because they have become accustomed to the reality of the cheat. We have all of the i.p. addresses of everyone/everywhere that hacked into the machines. And finally SCOTUS hears all evidence and WE WIN while waking up the whole nation. All done before Jan 2oth I know, I'm probably dreaming.
Yes but the fake printed ones will all have the same serial number/water mark number, if there is one. So if A Court letβs a case through, that piece of evidence would be prudent in proving fraud.
Your case is MOOT u/Brent75 !
The election is over!
You should have brought it sooner.
But, I did bring a case before the election.
That case was thrown out on Laches!
You hadn't suffered any negative impacts before the election!
But I brought a case before and after the election.
Nonsense! You have no standing!
Now, get out of my courtroom!
Exactly! So tired of the obvious corrupt courts.
My latest thoughts have been. We go through the election. There is enough fuckery that it takes a while to sort through. We have more and better evidence than we did before. We have braver judges because they have become accustomed to the reality of the cheat. We have all of the i.p. addresses of everyone/everywhere that hacked into the machines. And finally SCOTUS hears all evidence and WE WIN while waking up the whole nation. All done before Jan 2oth I know, I'm probably dreaming.
Yep. Thats going to be the story.
It's the perfect Catch-22
Bring the case before the election: you haven't suffered any harm yet
Bring the case after the election: the case is moot
And if both of those fail, just tell the plaintiff they have no standing.