BREAKING: Supreme Court Allows Virginia to Remove 1,600 Alleged Noncitizens from Voter Rolls – Three Liberal Justices Dissent 🐸🐸🐸
(www.thegatewaypundit.com)
🏆 - WINNING - 🏆
Comments (28)
sorted by:
Proof we have 3 brain dead supreme court justices. This should have been a no brainer decision.
You're right. We do have a ton of DEI and incompetent infested throughout our gov and industry, but I personally believe more times than not, it's just corruption using stupidity as an escape hatch when they get caught.
Corrupt AND stupid.
Impeachment, dereliction of duty, vote of no confidence, etc.
Get them off the bench.
'On Wednesday morning the Supreme Court ruled that Virginia will be allowed to remove the 1,600 suspected noncitizens from its voter rolls.
The three liberal justices dissented in the common sense opinion. Evidently the want US elections to be open to the world. This should automatically disqualify them from sitting on the nation’s highest court.'
I take it as admission they’re in the Epstein videos, prolly Puff Diddlers too
Sodamayor, Katanji and who else?
You know what's worse than an overly-emo liberal woman? An overly-emo liberal woman in a position of power. The three DEI-appointed SCOTUS justices from the past 15 years are absolutely useless.
Kagan
Probably Roberts, kek.
Only 1600? Was the number truly that small or was this some kind of joke/token removal?
It's for people who self identified as being illegal who were on the rolls for some reason.
Got it.
the real number is probably 1000x, 10000x that
When the SCOTUS Justices fail to interpret the Constitution according to its intent and meaning at the time of our Founders, they are failing in their purpose, and must be removed from the bench as unfit for the duties required.
What is the significance of the U.S. Constitution? It is, literally, the charter of its own existence. Without the Constitution, the government is a power without a right. It cannot act or operate outside of its charter, period.
“Where the words of a constitution are unambiguous and in their commonly received sense lead to a reasonable conclusion, it should be read according to the natural and most obvious import of the framers, without resorting to subtle and forced construction for the purpose of limiting or extending its operation.” ~ A State Ex Rel. Torryson v. Grey A State Ex Rel. Torryson v. Grey, 21 Nev. 378, 32 P. 190.
“In the United States, Sovereignty resides in the people, who act through the organs established by the Constitution.” ~ Chisholm v. Georgia Chisholm v. Georgia, 2 Dall 419, 471
“Under our form of government, the legislature is not supreme ... like other departments of government, it can only exercise such powers as have been delegated to it, and when it steps beyond that boundary, its acts, like those of the most humble magistrate in the state who transcends his jurisdiction, are utterly void.” ~ Billings v. Hall 7 CA 1
“In my judgment the people of no nation can lose their liberty so long as a Bill of Rights like ours survives and its basic purposes are conscientiously interpreted, enforced and respected so as to afford continuous protection against old, as well as new, devices and practices which might thwart those purposes. I fear to see the consequences of the Court's practice of substituting its own concepts of decency and fundamental justice for the language of the Bill of Rights as its point of departure in interpreting and enforcing that Bill of Rights.” ~ Justice Hugo L. Black (1886-1971) US Supreme Court Justice Adamson v. California, 332 U.S. 46, 89 (Dissent) (1947)
“The public welfare demands that constitutional cases must be decided according to the terms of the Constitution itself, and not according to judges’ views of fairness, reasonableness, or justice. I have no fear of constitutional amendments properly adopted, but I do fear the rewriting of the Constitution by judges under the guise of interpretation.” ~ Justice Hugo L. Black (1886-1971) US Supreme Court Justice Lecture, Columbia University, 1968
“The Framers of the Bill of Rights did not purport to “create” rights. Rather they designed the Bill of Rights to prohibit our Government from infringing rights and liberties presumed to be preexisting.” ~ Justice William J. Brennan (1906-1997) U. S. Supreme Court Justice 1982
“The right to revolt has sources deep in our history.” ~ William O. Douglas (1898-1980), U. S. Supreme Court Justice An Almanac of Liberty, 1954
“The strength of the constitution lies entirely in the determination of each citizen to defend it. Only if every single citizen feels duty bound to do his share in this defense are constitutional rights secure.” ~ Albert Einstein (1879-1955) Physicist and Professor, Nobel Prize 1921
Thanks for those citations and quotes.
I would amend this sentence:
to:
Telling a judge or bureaucrat he has no authority if he does not uphold the Constitution, as written, is a powerful statement to his ego. If he has integrity, it will make him think. If not, it will reveal his true colors.
You are correct.
Judges whonare void of judgement. Just like romans chapter one says.
WINNING!
We gotta get rid of them...
Absolutely worthless POS - each and every one of them.
They're simply not compatible with the direction of our Constitutional Republic.
AND... Since, fraud vitiates everything, those appointed during administrations that cheated to get in, should be kicked out post haste!
Absolutely!! 👍👍👍
NPR says the supreme court is now political. lol Didn't complain about the previous decisions so much I am sure
NPR et al complain and yell political whenever the supreme court rules in accordance with the constitution. They can't stand that we have a golden standard called the constitution and bill of rights.
I think maybe one thing Trump could do is to increase the number of judges to 11 AND make it a law that you can't add any more. This way we can add conservatives to the mix while Trump is in office and help cement a bulwark against the crazies.
Of course they'll give that little win to Trump it's not like he's going to win Virginia anyways I'd like to see them make some decisions that matter in some of the Swing States hopefully I'm wrong maybe he has a chance in Virginia
The precedent is set, though.
NO NON-CITIZENS allowed to vote.
So would that mean in all these other states when illegals vote because they were not taken off the voter rolls they will be able to disqualify their votes or will they still count because they were never taken off the voter rolls