He has a legal lease so they have to buy him out of it. I have always wondered if the media torrent about him and Epstein was a whipping boy type set up for Charles. Kinda like he took the flak in lieu of Charles, kinda a protect the heir look what we can do to you if you don’t bend the knee to the DS - to keep the queen and the royals in line? I think that was why Diana was killed - she was arguably their biggest “star” and the DS took her out as an object lesson - if we can take her out and tell anyone whatever we want then we can get all of you. Charles was publicly reported as being a “playboy” back in the day so I would not be surprised at all if he was in the orbit of Epstein and his network and it would make sense for any media storm to not burn him directly straight away but to go after his brother as an example of what will happen if he or his mother didn’t toe the line? Th he e Queen bent the knee to GEOTUS and th DS did not like that at all. I wondered if there was an agreement between her and Trump that Charles wouldn’t take the throne in favor of William but when she passed Charles reneged on it and went ahead with the public coronation. I think he’s broke (possibly the Queen forfeited the duchy of Lancaster which funds the monarchy if she bent the knee) which meant that when he took the throne he got the baubles and title but no money - as the duchy of Cornwall (which has more knee than Lancaster iirc) passed to William. William was in charge of the coronation and everyone seemed to defer to him. Even before she dies the Queen was treating William as her hand and 2IC rather than Charles. Also there’s been a lot of sly stories in the media taking shots at William and Catherine that have Charles fingerprints all over, they reek of his MO over the years. Also Charles has not moved against Harry the idiot in the us with his meddling in US politics and trying to break the 1st amendment with the aspen institute which kinda implies he’s ok with it.