Should Donald Trump be elected US president and attempt to end the Ukraine conflict in earnest, he could end up sharing the fate of John F. Kennedy, former Russian President Dmitry Medvedev has claimed. He also argued that relations between Washington and Moscow will likely remain highly strained regardless of who comes out on top in Tuesday's presidential election.
During the course of his campaign, the GOP candidate has repeatedly vowed to put an end to the bloodshed in Ukraine in short order, if elected. However, he has not provided any specifics. His Democratic rival, Kamala Harris, has suggested that Trump would essentially force Kiev to surrender.
Meanwhile, Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov has also expressed skepticism regarding the Republican nominee’s ability to stop the conflict overnight, noting that no “magic wand” exists with which he could do so.
In a post on his Telegram channel on Sunday, Medvedev, who currently serves as deputy chairman of Russia’s Security Council, wrote that Moscow does not have high expectations regarding the outcome of Tuesday’s US presidential election. He argued that “for Russia, the election won’t change anything, **as both candidates’ stances completely reflect the bipartisan consensus that our country has to be defeated.” ** (I don't know where he gets this from. I have never heard anything out of Trump mouth that suggest this stance.)
According to Medvedev, while on the campaign trail, a “somewhat fatigued Trump” has been dishing out “banalities” regarding peace prospects for Ukraine, and his supposedly good relations with world leaders. However, if elected, the Republican “would be forced to observe all of the rules of the system,” and would be “unable to stop the war. Not in a day, not in three days, not in three months.”
“And if he really attempts to [end the Ukraine conflict], he could become a new JFK,” the former Russian president warned.
John F. Kennedy, the 35th US president, was assassinated in 1963.
As for Harris, the Russian official dismissed her as “stupid, inexperienced [and] controllable.” Medvedev alleged that if elected, she would be a mere figurehead, with other officials and members of former President Barack Obama’s family pulling the strings.
In an exclusive interview with RT earlier this week, Medvedev stated that “if Western countries, especially the United States, had had enough flexibility and wisdom to make a security agreement with Russia, there would have been no special military operation [in Ukraine].” He said that the US and its allies failed to realize this in time because “they’re in the habit of bullying everyone into submission,” and of operating “on the principle of American exceptionalism and the primacy of US interests.”
Someone else scoffingly said something about Trump needing a magic wand. Trump seems to have a supply. Makes me wonder if certain problems really aren't as intractable as governments want us to think.
Maybe governments are actually creating our problems and telling us, "That's just life."
You are right there. It goes back to Alinsky's: Problem, Reaction, Solution.
I have heard rumours that certain law enforcement organisations do this. They help people to commit crimes and then claim all the kudos when they make arrests.
We see it in the workplace as well. All those managers who can manage a crisis are highly thought of and tend to get the biggest raises while the managers who manage so well that they never have any crises are looked down upon because they have such an easy life!