In complete respect of the law, of course.
Any ideas?
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (35)
sorted by:
GOWDY
All saddle and no horse.
The drops make me think otherwise
Not me. He was all talk when in congress. Literally got nothing done. I liked him at first, until I woke up and saw he was, at best, the equivalent of a sternly worded letter. I'd love it if he actually did something (same with Jordan.) I don't know what happens to these guys, but it appears someone gets to them and they go all soft noodle on the country.
I understand your point but perhaps he saved his ammunition? If we look at the cases Durham brought and how they were handled/outcome, it was obvious our courts have bias where there shouldn't be any. Look at the trials DJT went through: were they fair and free from bias? Prior to the 2016 election, James Comey stated that "no reasonable prosecutor" would bring a case against Hilary Clinton. A prosecutor's goal=guilty. Definition of reasonable is an ability to reason or "think logically" so he was telling the truth that no prosecutor with the ability to think logically, would bring a case against her because the corrupt"system" would NOT find her guilty even with overwhelming evidence to the contrary. As frustrating as it was to see Gowdy do nothing but a "strongly worded letter" it would have caused outright anger to see her let off the hook by a corrupt system.