That is because Hillary had 15% fraud (15% of the total for all candidates) in her total. That is why the democrats/DS thought she would never lose. Obama was at approximately 10%.
It is claimed that Clinton won the popular vote, which means she won more overall votes, hence a larger percentage. Fortunately, a large number of votes in California does not help you win the 16 electoral votes of Michigan, to pick an example. The chart data in no way contradict this.
Electoral college is what matters.
That is because Hillary had 15% fraud (15% of the total for all candidates) in her total. That is why the democrats/DS thought she would never lose. Obama was at approximately 10%.
That’s a cool insight - thank you.
It is claimed that Clinton won the popular vote, which means she won more overall votes, hence a larger percentage. Fortunately, a large number of votes in California does not help you win the 16 electoral votes of Michigan, to pick an example. The chart data in no way contradict this.
Oooooooh, now I get it. Brain freeze on my end. Appreciate the clarification. I wasn't thinking 'popular vote'. Thank you.
Ah, now I see the confusion. Small details can make all the difference.