“Secret Brunson ruling” bluff might be effective feint as leverage. Seems like a nuke one would hold back unless absolutely needed.
If true would likely be SCOTUS order to remove 388 gov’t officials to US Marshals with Writs of Mandamus and possibly arrest warrants for contempt (if they don’t comply). Would be sweet to see USM remove by force their “boss” Garland or Biden if they are in the 388.
I take no position on the Brunson case, but the history and doctrine of nuclear weapons is not to hold them back. He who shoots first has a good chance of being the victor. You only hold such weapons back for a second shot. Might want to rethink your metaphor, but generally waiting to strike a fatal blow is deemed stupid.
Big if True -- my standard response to all things Brunson so far . . .
“Secret Brunson ruling” bluff might be effective feint as leverage. Seems like a nuke one would hold back unless absolutely needed.
If true would likely be SCOTUS order to remove 388 gov’t officials to US Marshals with Writs of Mandamus and possibly arrest warrants for contempt (if they don’t comply). Would be sweet to see USM remove by force their “boss” Garland or Biden if they are in the 388.
I take no position on the Brunson case, but the history and doctrine of nuclear weapons is not to hold them back. He who shoots first has a good chance of being the victor. You only hold such weapons back for a second shot. Might want to rethink your metaphor, but generally waiting to strike a fatal blow is deemed stupid.