I honestly haven’t studied enough to be sure either way but I am aware of the possibility of alternate WWII history in which these very same arguments could be used to make Hitler sound like he wasn’t such a bad guy. Not saying he wasn’t. Just entertaining the thought. With all the propaganda and lies over the years from our own government and then throw in Operation Paperclip, who knows?
Enemy playbook seems similar with the sexual degeneration of the Weimar Republic compared to what they are doing here. I’m sure there are many other parallels. That alone is a known leftist tool to unburden people by what has been, so to speak. Was Hitler more of loyal nationalist, like Trump, than the demon he has been portrayed to be? Again, I don’t know, but I do know the history I learned was written by the winners and not by Hitler.
Not a Hitler sympathizer by any means. Just curious of the history of the liars who control the information of this world. I only have a public school education and know more about biblical history than later societies so perhaps I’m speaking ignorantly. As time goes by biblical history just gets more supported and stronger while secular history written by people with agendas seems to increasingly fall apart under scrutiny. Is it any wonder I question it?
Boring Tuesday afternoon inspired thoughts it seems, lol.
The Rothschilds used and funded Hitler (a member of their bloodline) to create the German war machine. They sacrificed the Jews in the Holocaust to generate worldwide sympathy and create the Zionist state of Israel.
The evidence that Hitler worked with the Zionists was that he made a deal with them (Haavara Agreement) to transfer some 60k Jewish Zionists to Palestine. The Jews that remained were sacrificed.
I've studied some of the same theories over the years too and while yours are similar to mine and many others, the major difference I believe is that while the Rothschilds did finance Hitler/NSDAP to get their nation up and going again for war purposes, the nsdap basically got out of their control and 'went rogue' so to speak. Meaning that they accepted everything they could get from them in terms of money and support but then turned on the Rothschilds.
I think people are forgetting that the German government captured and held Louis de Rothschild for a ransom of around $21 million. The Rothschilds paid up. The German government also produced a film entitled "die Rothschilds" which of course many western nations today call propaganda but nothing in the film itself is untrue regarding how the family came to be. I've seen the film and if you search around you can find a place to watch it.
That makes perfect sense. The same applies to his apparent support for the experimental shot.
I honestly haven’t studied enough to be sure either way but I am aware of the possibility of alternate WWII history in which these very same arguments could be used to make Hitler sound like he wasn’t such a bad guy. Not saying he wasn’t. Just entertaining the thought. With all the propaganda and lies over the years from our own government and then throw in Operation Paperclip, who knows?
Enemy playbook seems similar with the sexual degeneration of the Weimar Republic compared to what they are doing here. I’m sure there are many other parallels. That alone is a known leftist tool to unburden people by what has been, so to speak. Was Hitler more of loyal nationalist, like Trump, than the demon he has been portrayed to be? Again, I don’t know, but I do know the history I learned was written by the winners and not by Hitler.
Not a Hitler sympathizer by any means. Just curious of the history of the liars who control the information of this world. I only have a public school education and know more about biblical history than later societies so perhaps I’m speaking ignorantly. As time goes by biblical history just gets more supported and stronger while secular history written by people with agendas seems to increasingly fall apart under scrutiny. Is it any wonder I question it?
Boring Tuesday afternoon inspired thoughts it seems, lol.
More food for thought:
I've studied some of the same theories over the years too and while yours are similar to mine and many others, the major difference I believe is that while the Rothschilds did finance Hitler/NSDAP to get their nation up and going again for war purposes, the nsdap basically got out of their control and 'went rogue' so to speak. Meaning that they accepted everything they could get from them in terms of money and support but then turned on the Rothschilds.
I think people are forgetting that the German government captured and held Louis de Rothschild for a ransom of around $21 million. The Rothschilds paid up. The German government also produced a film entitled "die Rothschilds" which of course many western nations today call propaganda but nothing in the film itself is untrue regarding how the family came to be. I've seen the film and if you search around you can find a place to watch it.
What’s in "die Rothschilds" ?