Yes. I think that the CEO/owner Patrick Soon-Shiong, who bought the LA Times in 2018 and paid over $500 MILLION, realized that he needed to expand his readership in order to not go belly-up. And antagonizing, insulting and alienating the popular majority of people in the country was not beneficial for the bottom line.
Thus, his refusal to endorse anyone for President caused a number of his woke Lib employees to quit because he chose to remain neutral. And good riddance, it seems.
Yes. I think that the CEO/owner Patrick Soon-Shiong, who bought the LA Times in 2018 and paid over $500 MILLION, realized that he needed to expand his readership in order to not go belly-up. And antagonizing, insulting and alienating the popular majority of people in the country was not beneficial for the bottom line.
Thus, his refusal to endorse anyone for President caused a number of his woke Lib employees to quit because he chose to remain neutral. And good riddance, it seems.
And, now this! Hot dog!
What a great way to cut the excess fat without having to pay unemployment from firings!
Yes, good point!
Remaining neutral is not acceptable to the left.
You MUST pick a side.
So, his paper failed to endorse Harris. Woop-de-doo.
Does the LA Times have ANYTHING else on its record to it's favor?
999 slanders and crimes vs 1 'not endorsing' doth not a balanced sheet make...