Thanks. Additionally I just fully read this. I think Sundance has a good understanding of how government works, and I find his information very educational.
It would be amazing if during Trumps first 100 days a convention of states was call with the sole item for consideration being the repeal of the 17th amendment to return selection of senators back to state legislators.
All other elected federal corruption is dependent on a corrupt and ineffective Senate. If we correct the problems with the Senate and reconnect the representation within the chamber to the state-level legislative bodies, we will then see immediate change. However, there would be ZERO institutional allies in this effort.
I would put the SSCI at the head of the corruption in the Senate. It's one of the reasons I feel strongly that the SSCI needs a MAGA leader, if that is even possible. The same RINOs that just elected Thune would never put a MAGA in charge of the SSCI.
I wonder if VP Vance could step in as Leader of the Senate and appoint a MAGA Leader for SSCI?
Do we really trust SCOUTS to prevent a runaway convention? My concern is that there will be too many traitors, paid for with Soros type funds, that will destroy the intent of the constitution.
I hope I am wrong on that if a convention happens. I had thought it was a good idea until an old gentleman delegate pointed out to me that SCOTUS has not been the friend of limited government since at least when Roe v Wade happened.
We have some great justices & if this Brunson case ends up removing justices who failed their duties to uphold the constitution and also if Trump replaces them with ultra Constitutionalist picks, then I see a convention of states being a no brainer.
Thanks. Additionally I just fully read this. I think Sundance has a good understanding of how government works, and I find his information very educational.
It would be amazing if during Trumps first 100 days a convention of states was call with the sole item for consideration being the repeal of the 17th amendment to return selection of senators back to state legislators.
Thanks, fren.
This is a good summation in many ways.
I would put the SSCI at the head of the corruption in the Senate. It's one of the reasons I feel strongly that the SSCI needs a MAGA leader, if that is even possible. The same RINOs that just elected Thune would never put a MAGA in charge of the SSCI.
I wonder if VP Vance could step in as Leader of the Senate and appoint a MAGA Leader for SSCI?
Do we really trust SCOUTS to prevent a runaway convention? My concern is that there will be too many traitors, paid for with Soros type funds, that will destroy the intent of the constitution.
I hope I am wrong on that if a convention happens. I had thought it was a good idea until an old gentleman delegate pointed out to me that SCOTUS has not been the friend of limited government since at least when Roe v Wade happened.
We have some great justices & if this Brunson case ends up removing justices who failed their duties to uphold the constitution and also if Trump replaces them with ultra Constitutionalist picks, then I see a convention of states being a no brainer.