I think this makes sense from the viewpoint of a CIA-trained intel officer. Why? because in the CIA context, psyop always means manipulation.
I think that as used by the broader Q movement, "psyop" has a slightly different connotation. Taking the original term, and attaching a slightly different meaning/nuance to it. "Psychological operation".
In the 5G sense of the word, I think it would be fair to say that psychological operations are engaged in to "influence", which is different from "manipulate". And, in 5G war, the psychological aspect is very real, and both sides must engage with it.
two
"If there was a highly positioned officer with highest clearance dropping classified information on the dark web, they would be arrested for espionage within a week"
Sigh. "arrest" You mean like all the evil perpetrators at C_A etc, who do all manner of evil shit but who are NEVER arrested? Kind of a joke to say "if some intel officer was doing [x], they would be arrested within a week when all manner of intel officers have been doing crap for decades and never, ever been arrested.
Who would do the arresting? The DOJ? Or does he mean that the DS C_A would attack such an individual/team and destroy them?
"Classified information" Did Q ever drop classified information? Kek. Even the humblest anon knows that Q did not ever drop classified info, precisely because it would be illegal to do so. Rather, Q used publicly available data to inspire and stimulate thinking and research. Strike two, Mr. Shipp.
"On the dark web" Er, the chans, 4-chan/pol, 8-chan, 8-kun, these are "the dark web????? This statement throws a lot of doubt on Shipp's whole narrative about who he is. I mean, it's fundamentally basic hacker or serious netizen level knowledge that the chans are NOT the dark web.
The idea that the chans are or were the dark web is a totally normie level MSM narrative to scare folks about Q and redirect them away. How could an intel officer of that level of experience that Shipp purports to be say this?
That's as far as I've gotten.
Not too highly motivated to listen much more.
I listened to his interview with Owens, and while I found it both compelling and believable, I also found myself wondering, how is it that Owens is on yutub, never banned, never deplatformed like anons or other serious truth tellers?
Afaik, Owens outed herself as a Con Inc. (aka "RINO" for the truth community - TTINO Truth teller in name only) Anti-trump stooge after the 2022 midterms
I recall at first liking her when she came across my radar pre-2022, then hearing from frogs here that her father was dodgy, came to think she is controlled oppo. In recent times, she's been going much harder on some core topics, like 9-11, C_A, JFK assassination, etc, so I've wondered... "Did she have an awakening?"
Never pay attention to her, because essentially I know she comes from the fair-weather 'maga' pretender crowd, outed in 2022, but I decided to listen to the Shipp interview.
She is clearly a lightweight. Very lightweight, in the least. Very smooth for the public airways type of person, but doesn't have that grittiness that more serious (and upfront) people have. And, I wonder, why is she on youtube.
Now I have to wonder about her and Shipp. I should listen to Shipps Q statement more, because although I think his initial position makes sense (research, make up your own mind, due diligence, etc), even the statements above start to ring out like FAKE, FAKE, FAKE because the arguments are MSM narrative level stuff. Like controlled oppo.
Anyway, a few thoughts. Glad you posted to link, winny, although I am not that much drawn to listen to stuff outside my portfolio these days. This, interestingly enough, has serendipity written all over it, considering that I listened to the Shipp interview just earlier this week (and that is something outside of my usual routine, completely)
Fwiw, this "George" guy also seems pretty lightweight and a nice TTINO. "All will come out in the next four years..." We do NOT know what will happen or how things will unfold, and anyone who tells themselves that they do know is fooling themselves. Me? I've learned to eschew the fallacy of comforting beliefs based in bias confirmation and my own projection. I consider myself much more based now.
OP also posts a lot of that sort of stuff, fwiw. Big declarations, certainty in thinking "this is it". Etc. Q called me to learn to think freely, not to learn to simply switch one matrix (set of beliefs) for another.
I also notice the direction of these "burst on the scene with dubious beginnings" personalities appear to be working in lock-step to advance the "Jews are behind everything" narrative, which, to me is a cabal narrative with which to shield themselves. Time will tell if they actually trace things to the top, or merely stop at the front lines.
When it all goes down blame the Jews, right? Meanwhile the actual ringleaders escape to regroup and fight another day, another generational secret society network begins. New names, new logos, same old tired bullshit.
And don't get me started on their (the burst on the scenes) religion. I notice patterns is all, honest!
No shit Kevin Shipp you glowing clown. We've only been saying this for oh Idk, about 3 decades?
In other news, here is Kevin Shipp being an absolute faggot clown: https://www.bitchute.com/video/aIEks8YxKGwX
Hmmm...
A few points (this far into the video):
one
"there is no such thing as a 'good' psyop"
I think this makes sense from the viewpoint of a CIA-trained intel officer. Why? because in the CIA context, psyop always means manipulation.
I think that as used by the broader Q movement, "psyop" has a slightly different connotation. Taking the original term, and attaching a slightly different meaning/nuance to it. "Psychological operation".
In the 5G sense of the word, I think it would be fair to say that psychological operations are engaged in to "influence", which is different from "manipulate". And, in 5G war, the psychological aspect is very real, and both sides must engage with it.
two
"If there was a highly positioned officer with highest clearance dropping classified information on the dark web, they would be arrested for espionage within a week"
Sigh. "arrest" You mean like all the evil perpetrators at C_A etc, who do all manner of evil shit but who are NEVER arrested? Kind of a joke to say "if some intel officer was doing [x], they would be arrested within a week when all manner of intel officers have been doing crap for decades and never, ever been arrested.
Who would do the arresting? The DOJ? Or does he mean that the DS C_A would attack such an individual/team and destroy them?
"Classified information" Did Q ever drop classified information? Kek. Even the humblest anon knows that Q did not ever drop classified info, precisely because it would be illegal to do so. Rather, Q used publicly available data to inspire and stimulate thinking and research. Strike two, Mr. Shipp.
"On the dark web" Er, the chans, 4-chan/pol, 8-chan, 8-kun, these are "the dark web????? This statement throws a lot of doubt on Shipp's whole narrative about who he is. I mean, it's fundamentally basic hacker or serious netizen level knowledge that the chans are NOT the dark web.
The idea that the chans are or were the dark web is a totally normie level MSM narrative to scare folks about Q and redirect them away. How could an intel officer of that level of experience that Shipp purports to be say this?
That's as far as I've gotten.
Not too highly motivated to listen much more.
I listened to his interview with Owens, and while I found it both compelling and believable, I also found myself wondering, how is it that Owens is on yutub, never banned, never deplatformed like anons or other serious truth tellers?
Afaik, Owens outed herself as a Con Inc. (aka "RINO" for the truth community - TTINO Truth teller in name only) Anti-trump stooge after the 2022 midterms
https://www.salon.com/2022/11/14/incompetent-one-by-one-longtime-allies-are-trashing-him-in-public-after-midterm-failure/
I recall at first liking her when she came across my radar pre-2022, then hearing from frogs here that her father was dodgy, came to think she is controlled oppo. In recent times, she's been going much harder on some core topics, like 9-11, C_A, JFK assassination, etc, so I've wondered... "Did she have an awakening?"
Never pay attention to her, because essentially I know she comes from the fair-weather 'maga' pretender crowd, outed in 2022, but I decided to listen to the Shipp interview.
She is clearly a lightweight. Very lightweight, in the least. Very smooth for the public airways type of person, but doesn't have that grittiness that more serious (and upfront) people have. And, I wonder, why is she on youtube.
Now I have to wonder about her and Shipp. I should listen to Shipps Q statement more, because although I think his initial position makes sense (research, make up your own mind, due diligence, etc), even the statements above start to ring out like FAKE, FAKE, FAKE because the arguments are MSM narrative level stuff. Like controlled oppo.
Anyway, a few thoughts. Glad you posted to link, winny, although I am not that much drawn to listen to stuff outside my portfolio these days. This, interestingly enough, has serendipity written all over it, considering that I listened to the Shipp interview just earlier this week (and that is something outside of my usual routine, completely)
Fwiw, this "George" guy also seems pretty lightweight and a nice TTINO. "All will come out in the next four years..." We do NOT know what will happen or how things will unfold, and anyone who tells themselves that they do know is fooling themselves. Me? I've learned to eschew the fallacy of comforting beliefs based in bias confirmation and my own projection. I consider myself much more based now.
OP also posts a lot of that sort of stuff, fwiw. Big declarations, certainty in thinking "this is it". Etc. Q called me to learn to think freely, not to learn to simply switch one matrix (set of beliefs) for another.
I also notice the direction of these "burst on the scene with dubious beginnings" personalities appear to be working in lock-step to advance the "Jews are behind everything" narrative, which, to me is a cabal narrative with which to shield themselves. Time will tell if they actually trace things to the top, or merely stop at the front lines.
When it all goes down blame the Jews, right? Meanwhile the actual ringleaders escape to regroup and fight another day, another generational secret society network begins. New names, new logos, same old tired bullshit.
And don't get me started on their (the burst on the scenes) religion. I notice patterns is all, honest!
edit - Aw papist doesnt like my comment again aw
kek.
You and me is 100% on the same page on this one...