... what is the purpose of attacking him with lawfare?
Warning: Pure speculation on my part.
First you build someone up and get them to release some interesting information. When a story comes along that the conventional media cannot suppress then you start to use people like Jones. You find him a witness to, say, pizzagate. You make sure that 95% of his story is correct but that last 5% is wrong and can be shown to be wrong. You get Jones to publish the story then you go after him through the courts exposing the 5% lie.
Now the other outlets decide to suppress any pizzagate stories they might have because they do not want to get sued like Jones.
Of course you don't want to really put him out of business because he is still useful. For instance, the Sandy Hook story refuses to lie down. Why not do the same again?
Even he is wrong about 5% of the story, there is still freedom of speech, so it really makes zero sense to use this as an avenue of attack against other conservative podcasters. It just exposes the censorship industrial complex, which is exactly what happened. That is a pretty convoluted plan to use Jones as an angle of attack.
The hate on Alex Jones on this site is off the charts. Sad.
I don’t hate the man. I just think he’s controlled opposition. That’s all. Nothing to hate about.
If he is controlled opposition, what is the purpose of attacking him with lawfare?
Warning: Pure speculation on my part.
First you build someone up and get them to release some interesting information. When a story comes along that the conventional media cannot suppress then you start to use people like Jones. You find him a witness to, say, pizzagate. You make sure that 95% of his story is correct but that last 5% is wrong and can be shown to be wrong. You get Jones to publish the story then you go after him through the courts exposing the 5% lie.
Now the other outlets decide to suppress any pizzagate stories they might have because they do not want to get sued like Jones.
Of course you don't want to really put him out of business because he is still useful. For instance, the Sandy Hook story refuses to lie down. Why not do the same again?
Now that is some fair speculation. Thank you for taking the time to type that instead of ad hominen attack or say "trust me bro"
Even he is wrong about 5% of the story, there is still freedom of speech, so it really makes zero sense to use this as an avenue of attack against other conservative podcasters. It just exposes the censorship industrial complex, which is exactly what happened. That is a pretty convoluted plan to use Jones as an angle of attack.
It would be easier to do a thousand other things than this whole song and dance.