... what is the purpose of attacking him with lawfare?
Warning: Pure speculation on my part.
First you build someone up and get them to release some interesting information. When a story comes along that the conventional media cannot suppress then you start to use people like Jones. You find him a witness to, say, pizzagate. You make sure that 95% of his story is correct but that last 5% is wrong and can be shown to be wrong. You get Jones to publish the story then you go after him through the courts exposing the 5% lie.
Now the other outlets decide to suppress any pizzagate stories they might have because they do not want to get sued like Jones.
Of course you don't want to really put him out of business because he is still useful. For instance, the Sandy Hook story refuses to lie down. Why not do the same again?
Even he is wrong about 5% of the story, there is still freedom of speech, so it really makes zero sense to use this as an avenue of attack against other conservative podcasters. It just exposes the censorship industrial complex, which is exactly what happened. That is a pretty convoluted plan to use Jones as an angle of attack.
Deep state has always used lawfare! White Hats will obviously use lawfare to get rid of control opposition! Two can play the game! Everyone who was not controlled opposition during their reign was taken out! How did this guy survive without military protection?
Oh, now I see. Um, I think the Winn was suggesting that not knowing that Q was been pretty clear about who and what Alex Jones was qualifies one as some sort of legume or fruit consisting of a hard shell protecting the kernel.
Believing in Q is way more out there than believing Alex Jones.
Have you read the drops? The stuff Q said was much more believable than at least half of all AJ content, however the media loved to strawman the two together
The hate on Alex Jones on this site is off the charts. Sad.
I don’t hate the man. I just think he’s controlled opposition. That’s all. Nothing to hate about.
If he is controlled opposition, what is the purpose of attacking him with lawfare?
Warning: Pure speculation on my part.
First you build someone up and get them to release some interesting information. When a story comes along that the conventional media cannot suppress then you start to use people like Jones. You find him a witness to, say, pizzagate. You make sure that 95% of his story is correct but that last 5% is wrong and can be shown to be wrong. You get Jones to publish the story then you go after him through the courts exposing the 5% lie.
Now the other outlets decide to suppress any pizzagate stories they might have because they do not want to get sued like Jones.
Of course you don't want to really put him out of business because he is still useful. For instance, the Sandy Hook story refuses to lie down. Why not do the same again?
Now that is some fair speculation. Thank you for taking the time to type that instead of ad hominen attack or say "trust me bro"
Even he is wrong about 5% of the story, there is still freedom of speech, so it really makes zero sense to use this as an avenue of attack against other conservative podcasters. It just exposes the censorship industrial complex, which is exactly what happened. That is a pretty convoluted plan to use Jones as an angle of attack.
It would be easier to do a thousand other things than this whole song and dance.
Deep state has always used lawfare! White Hats will obviously use lawfare to get rid of control opposition! Two can play the game! Everyone who was not controlled opposition during their reign was taken out! How did this guy survive without military protection?
Fake fight & optics. To generate confusion.
Or a really good actor
This is a Q board fucknuts. Q said AJ was MOSSAD
Bill Cooper said he was a fraud and a clown
And he's proven to be a retard and strawman for the world to attack truth seekers for decades.
He's most definitely government controlled misdirection.
The opposition also has access to read Q posts... just sayin
Yeah and they hated the anti-AJ posts because AJ was one of their most valuable assets. "Lead the opposition yourselves" or something like that..
"I TALKED TO QANON" KEK
Q said some disinfo is necessary.
If Q hadn’t parted ways with Alex, Q would’ve become synonymous with Infowars/Alex Jones. Obviously, the Plan couldn’t work that way.
https://qalerts.app/?n=2102
I'm still going with bad actor
👏👏👏 Yes yes yes !
This is a Q board full of fucknuts?
<extra facepalm>
Allow me to grammarize the Winn's articulations:
This is a Q board, fucknuts!
Oh, now I see. Um, I think the Winn was suggesting that not knowing that Q was been pretty clear about who and what Alex Jones was qualifies one as some sort of legume or fruit consisting of a hard shell protecting the kernel.
😂😂😂🫘
*has
Sometimes! Kek
The gripe is real and it goes way way back to early Q drops. He deserves it.
Believing in Q is way more out there than believing Alex Jones. If Alex Jones is controlled, then he is the greatest actor of all time.
Have you read the drops? The stuff Q said was much more believable than at least half of all AJ content, however the media loved to strawman the two together