... what is the purpose of attacking him with lawfare?
Warning: Pure speculation on my part.
First you build someone up and get them to release some interesting information. When a story comes along that the conventional media cannot suppress then you start to use people like Jones. You find him a witness to, say, pizzagate. You make sure that 95% of his story is correct but that last 5% is wrong and can be shown to be wrong. You get Jones to publish the story then you go after him through the courts exposing the 5% lie.
Now the other outlets decide to suppress any pizzagate stories they might have because they do not want to get sued like Jones.
Of course you don't want to really put him out of business because he is still useful. For instance, the Sandy Hook story refuses to lie down. Why not do the same again?
The hate on Alex Jones on this site is off the charts. Sad.
I don’t hate the man. I just think he’s controlled opposition. That’s all. Nothing to hate about.
If he is controlled opposition, what is the purpose of attacking him with lawfare?
Warning: Pure speculation on my part.
First you build someone up and get them to release some interesting information. When a story comes along that the conventional media cannot suppress then you start to use people like Jones. You find him a witness to, say, pizzagate. You make sure that 95% of his story is correct but that last 5% is wrong and can be shown to be wrong. You get Jones to publish the story then you go after him through the courts exposing the 5% lie.
Now the other outlets decide to suppress any pizzagate stories they might have because they do not want to get sued like Jones.
Of course you don't want to really put him out of business because he is still useful. For instance, the Sandy Hook story refuses to lie down. Why not do the same again?
It would be easier to do a thousand other things than this whole song and dance.