De-Karenation of Agencies

You give them a freemium model. You get 25, or 50, or whatever number of regulations (<100) for FREE. This is the free tier.

After that, the Agency has to pay back to the government in the form of paying off the Federal Deficit, in interagency fees. This causes agencies to defund themselves to the extent they are overly-controlling.

Tier 1

If you want to pass more regulations, you pay $10,000 per regulation after the Free Tier for up to 10 regulations.

Tier 2

For the next 10 regulations after tiers 0 and 1 ( > Freemium + 10), the agency has to pay $100,000 per regulation

Tier 3

For the next 10 regulations after tiers 0 and 1 and 2 ( > Freemium + 20), the agency has to pay $500,000 per regulation

Tier 4

For the next 5 regulations after tiers 0 and 1 and 2 and 3 ( > Freemium + 25), the agency has to pay $1M per regulation

Tier 5

For the next 3 regulations after tiers 0 and 1 and 2 and 3 and 4 ( > Freemium + 28), the agency has to pay $10M per regulation

Tier 6

For the next 3 regulations after tiers 0-5 ( > Freemium + 30), the agency has to pay $100M per regulation

Tier 77

For the next 33 regulations after tiers 0-5 ( > Freemium + 33), the agency has to pay $3.3B per regulation

2 comments

2 comments share save hide report block hide replies

To The Great Awakening

We are researchers who deal in open-source information, reasoned argument, and dank memes. We do battle in the sphere of ideas and ideas only. We neither need nor condone the use of force in our work here. WE ARE THE PUBLIC FACE OF Q. OUR MISSION IS TO RED-PILL NORMIES.

This is a pro-Q community. Please read and respect our rules below before contributing.

WHY Q?

"Those who cannot understand that we cannot simply start arresting w/o first: ensuring the safety & well-being of the population shifting the narrative removing those in DC through resignation to ensure success defeating ISIS/MS13 to prevent fail-safes freezing assets to remove network-to-network abilities kill off COC to prevent top-down comms/org, etc. etc. should not be participating in discussions." Q

Comments (2)

sorted by:

▲ 3 ▼

– The_Watcher 3 points 4 days ago +3 / -0

I believe the traditional process is:

Regulator finds new rule to grab more power and reduce freedoms.
Regulator gives money to activist NGO to prosecute the Regulator.
NGO then sues the Regulator because it has not enforced that rule.
Regulator goes to government and says: "Look, we are being sued, we need to apply that rule."
Government says: "OK, we have no choice if you are getting sued."
Regulator enacts rule and grabs yet more power.

permalink save report block reply

▲ 2 ▼

– redtoe-skipper 2 points 4 days ago +2 / -0

Regulations are only for the government.

Any official enforcing regulations is in violation of 18 USC 241/242.

And Congress can only make laws which are constitutional. Any Congress member voting to make a law of an unconstitutional bill has violated his oath, and should face the consequences of that.