We all know that the number one alternative candidate (other than Osama bin Laden) for the 9/11 attack was the state of Israel. This is why Israel is the "keystone" of both Qanon and freemasonry (Joe Lange has good writing on Israel as the keystone).
A few weeks ago I learned that there are strong arguments that Jesus was born on September 11, 3 BC. The classic book is by Ernest Martin and was written in 1991, long before the terror attack.
So my natural question is:
Did Israel attack on September 11 in part because its leaders believed that Jesus was born on September 11?
And, since Jesus is associated with goodness and turning the other cheek, would this be a reason why many or most of the deaths on 9/11 were faked, as argued by Miles Mathis?
A related question is: if orthodox Christianity was created, in part, to hide important truths about Jesus, then would the Julian and/or Gregorian calendar (with all of its apparent shortcomings) be designed in part to hide Jesus' birthday on September 11?
Jesus was born June 17th.
In Luke 2:8 it states: To be taxed with Mary his espoused wife, being great with child. 6And so it was, that, while they were there, the days were accomplished that she should be delivered. And she brought forth her firstborn son, and wrapped him in swaddling clothes, and laid him in a manger; because there was no room for them in the inn. 8And there were in the same country shepherds abiding in the field, keeping watch over their flock by night.
https://www.kingjamesbibleonline.org/Luke-2-8/
Theory is the Shepards would not be laying in the fields watching their flock in December, it would be winter at that time. Shepards would have already brought their flocks in from the fields for market.
The Great Star of Bethlehem was seen when Jesus was born. It wasn't actually a star, it was the converging light as Jupitor and Venus crossed paths, this would have occurred on June 17th 2 BC.
The star seemed to stop migrating as it entered about waist level of Virgo (the virgin) It didn't stop there as a sign from God, it was actually switching from a progression to retrogression.
https://truthinscripture.net/2017/01/04/jesus-birth-the-star-of-bethlehem/
December 25th was chosen by Pagans to be the birthday of Jesus. In actuality, December 25th was a day Roman Pagans worshiped their Sun God Sol. They changed Jesus's birthday to confuse Christians and have them celebrate on the same day the Pagans were worshiping the Sun God. The Devil works in mysterious ways,
https://historycooperative.org/pagan-origins-of-christmas/
I've heard that one (Jupiter-Venus) and once had it on my short list. Now Jesus was born before Herod died, which is before Archelaus succeeded him and put down a rebellion on the day of Passover (the spring full moon), according to Josephus. He then has Archelaus deposed in his 10th year, which everyone has as 6 AD, the rebellion of Judas of Galilee (mentioned in Acts by Gamaliel) and the renaming of Idumea as part of Judaea. There was no zero year, so it appears Archelaus began reigning in 4 BC and not after June of 2 BC. Unless something in this paragraph is wrong.
Add: The data about December 25 is relatively accurate. However, God always anticipates things and set up Hanukkah around the winter solstice as well, which was prophesied by Daniel and the date by Haggai 2. So there's always God's older witness to anything counterfeited.
Plus, there's the whole symbolism of the "light of the world" coming in at the darkest time of the year.
I trust Christian Tradition way way more than the "latest findings" and various other speculative research of modern times: I am metaphysically certain that Jesus was born in December.
A primary reason for the mainstream church tradition is the good Eastern Christian tradition that Jesus was baptized on January 6 (in Tybi), and this celebration was connected to his birth very early, thus giving rise to the later 4th-century published date of December 25.
However, earlier evidence for December 25 itself is conflicting, with manuscripts of Hippolytus varying among themselves, and with Clement of Alexandria being unhelpful as usual. Clement's Stromata has Christ's birth as 194 years, 1 month, 13 days before the death of Commodus (31 Dec 193 AD), implying mid-November of 2 BC. Hippolytus's Canon has Jesus's genesis on 2 April of 2 BC, though "genesis" may mean either birth or conception. So the author seems to support a backdating, using Hippolytus's other statements, to conception around 25 March of 4 BC, birth 25 December of 4 BC, which is not too far off from my preferred date of birth 6 October of 4 BC.
This source has rawer data than I've seen and so it's worth pursuit, and it also doesn't do a severe injustice to the concerns I've raised before, so being open-minded I'll need to look more into it. One difficulty is the shepherds in the field and the other non-winter activities of the narrative; another is the timing of John's birth to accord with the Levitical cycles governing Zechariah's service. So I appreciate your goading me to look into this and find more to the story, and I'll keep these traditions in mind moving forward. If I do need to make changes to account for everything I've seen, I'll publish that; but for now there's not sufficient data to overturn my initial presumptions.