Then no one will be able to access the courts, because all I have to do is get such expensive legal representation that you could never afford to lose.
Then what? Pass some stupid legislation to "cap court costs?" So now I can't choose my own defense because it might cost too much for you?
Somebody sued you because they said your dog not them but it wasn’t your dog. You have to hire a lawyer and pay them to defend a frivolous lawsuit. Just like Trump had to pay for his defense in all those frivolous lawsuits. Something needs to be done to stop frivolous lawsuits.
Those attorneys would get money from the losing side. If the losing side does not have a legit case, most of those attorneys would just say there is not possible win & they are not risking a loss of time on someone without assets. For a $1k representation they might, but not for a case that could run 10k+
Frivilous law suits would stop due to attorneys on both sides realizing they wouldn't get paid.
I have an ex who has had a couple lawyers drop her once they realize she submitted false information & that I go after lawyers who allow my ex to submit false documents.
These lawyers want to repay their loans & would stop representing Frivilous law suits almost overnight if they thought they would never get paid.
I still have never heard a convincing argument as to why we should not do a closer pay all system. Though I am certainly open to the concept if a rational, and persuasive, idea comes along.
Then no one will be able to access the courts, because all I have to do is get such expensive legal representation that you could never afford to lose.
Then what? Pass some stupid legislation to "cap court costs?" So now I can't choose my own defense because it might cost too much for you?
These ideas are pretty Un-American.
Somebody sued you because they said your dog not them but it wasn’t your dog. You have to hire a lawyer and pay them to defend a frivolous lawsuit. Just like Trump had to pay for his defense in all those frivolous lawsuits. Something needs to be done to stop frivolous lawsuits.
Those attorneys would get money from the losing side. If the losing side does not have a legit case, most of those attorneys would just say there is not possible win & they are not risking a loss of time on someone without assets. For a $1k representation they might, but not for a case that could run 10k+
Frivilous law suits would stop due to attorneys on both sides realizing they wouldn't get paid.
I have an ex who has had a couple lawyers drop her once they realize she submitted false information & that I go after lawyers who allow my ex to submit false documents.
These lawyers want to repay their loans & would stop representing Frivilous law suits almost overnight if they thought they would never get paid.
I still have never heard a convincing argument as to why we should not do a closer pay all system. Though I am certainly open to the concept if a rational, and persuasive, idea comes along.