35
Mandela Effect: WH psyop to encourage critical thinking in the masses?
posted ago by weholdthesetruths ago by weholdthesetruths +35 / -0

Someone just posted “Looney Tunes” in another thread and it got me thinking, “That’s funny. Tunes literally makes no sense. I know for a fact it was always Looney Toons, ‘toons’ being short for ‘cartoons.’ Tunes refers to music. That simply doesn’t make any sense. In ‘Who Framed Roger Rabbit’ didn’t they refer to all the cartoon characters as ‘toons’? Wasn’t there a ‘Toon Town’? In fact, after the movie’s release, didn’t they build Toontown at Disneyland and Disney World’s Magic Kingdom?”

Looked it up. And sure enough, they did. Toontown is still spelled that way. And it only made sense that they would, because the damn show was called Looney Toons.

I could go on with famous quotes like “Mirror Mirror on the wall” (now appears to say “Magic Mirror on the wall”) that have been quoted in hundreds of other Hollywood movies (“No, I am your father” instead of “Luke, I am your father”, or Hannibal Lecter saying “Good morning” instead of “Hello Clarice”, etc.) and they’re all compelling.

But the biggest one for me has always been Fruit of the Loom underwear. I know for a fact that the logo used to have a cornucopia in it. I know because I used to sit there as a child and think “Ok there’s the fruit. So that thing must be called a loom.” Even after I learned what a cornucopia was, I still assumed the underwear had something to do with Thanksgiving, or that maybe “loom” was another name for cornucopia, or maybe it was considered a cornucopia only when there was fruit sitting in it, and that on its own it was called a loom.

This wasn’t just something I could misremember. It represented, funny as it sounds, some of my earliest development in the area of logic as a child. The memory is strong because of how it forced me to reason. This isn’t something one can simply misremember, like a line from a movie, or the approximate date of a famous person from Africa dying. This was something I thought about every single time I looked at my damn underwear as a child: “If this is the fruit, this thing must be the loom.”

And millions of others remember it too. But the company swears its logo has never changed from what it is now.

To me that’s the smoking gun that this whole thing is bullshit.

But why? It just smacks of a psyop to me. But with what goal? Well, what was the result? Well…it got a lot of people engaged in questioning their own minds, their own memories, and their own assumptions.

At first I thought of it as a likely BH psyop designed to further unravel the fabric of society away from believing in objective truth (see: trannies ana trying to normalize pedophilia), but I’m starting to think it either backfired, or was a WH, or even Q quantum computer operation all along to help the masses start down the road of critical thinking. Something tells me it played a role in waking a lot of people up, or at least priming them for their wake up.

Thoughts?

13 comments
13 comments share save hide report block hide replies