So why does the left and Madison Avenue (ads) and the movie industry want to portray b/w couples well beyond the natural tendency of b/w to marry? There is really no longer any stigma against it. So why the predominance of so many b/w couples in their ads when they are not appealing to either race? The study suggests the ads are not well received by either race or of either gender.
The unis (e.g. marketing majors, journalism majors, not to mention gender studies majors) are all leftists. Whites are evil! So marry one of them??
I think ArmLady is saying, for example of 3 of 10 white guys marry a black female, why is the media pushing via commercial ads a rate of 8 out if 10 white dudes w black chicks.
Personally, I rather think it is a moot question. In my experience, interracial relationships are fat more commin in the south than liberal northeast wherein they are 'too intellectual to be racist'.
The commercial that bother me are the ones pushing same sex relationships as they feed into the pushing of the LGBTQ mafia.
Since I am not inherently prejudice regarding ethnicities, commercials depicting such are pretty much invisible/unnoteworthy to me.
You are so right! I watched some "holiday" mystery movies on the weekend. One movie had two homosexual couples. One movie had two inter-racial couples. Both movies had one heterosexual couple as the main love interest.
So the script writers were obviously "forcing" the message of inter-racial and LGBT, while still writing about a white couple trying to find love . . . Interestingly, the other mentioned couples had already found it . . .
Not to mention the commercials. The ads for HIV meds are especially explicit that way . . . One might conclude only black people and homosexuals get it . . .
I am saying that a man chooses a woman to be a good wife and good mother to his children. At least he should. Sexual attraction is part of that, but not ultimately unilaterally determanitive.
Ok... what people are missing about interracial dating
.
A man has to SUPPRESS those chemical responses of attraction.
He has to go against his natural instincts because it might piss off people in his social circle.
What marketing people know.
Is that all it takes is an attractive man and an attractive women to make a couple.
Isn't everyone at some time, attracted chemically to a person who would be WRONG for him or her? If RIGHT for him or her, the social circle may or may not be determinative??
YES a MAN has to suppress those chemical responses of attraction, that is what a man is! otherwise he will be a slave to his chemical desires, whereas he really wants and needs a good woman to be his loyal wife and to raise HIS children.
It takes a couple being attracted to each other. Not necessarily the presumed norm of physical standards of beauty.
So why does the left and Madison Avenue (ads) and the movie industry want to portray b/w couples well beyond the natural tendency of b/w to marry? There is really no longer any stigma against it. So why the predominance of so many b/w couples in their ads when they are not appealing to either race? The study suggests the ads are not well received by either race or of either gender.
The unis (e.g. marketing majors, journalism majors, not to mention gender studies majors) are all leftists. Whites are evil! So marry one of them??
Because you missing NATURAL tendacy,
Are you saying that if a white man is at a beach. And he sees an inshape attractive black woman in a bikini walk in front of him.
Are you suggesting there would be ZERO chemical reaction?
I don't think that is what Army Lady is saying.
I think ArmLady is saying, for example of 3 of 10 white guys marry a black female, why is the media pushing via commercial ads a rate of 8 out if 10 white dudes w black chicks.
Personally, I rather think it is a moot question. In my experience, interracial relationships are fat more commin in the south than liberal northeast wherein they are 'too intellectual to be racist'.
The commercial that bother me are the ones pushing same sex relationships as they feed into the pushing of the LGBTQ mafia.
Since I am not inherently prejudice regarding ethnicities, commercials depicting such are pretty much invisible/unnoteworthy to me.
You are so right! I watched some "holiday" mystery movies on the weekend. One movie had two homosexual couples. One movie had two inter-racial couples. Both movies had one heterosexual couple as the main love interest.
So the script writers were obviously "forcing" the message of inter-racial and LGBT, while still writing about a white couple trying to find love . . . Interestingly, the other mentioned couples had already found it . . .
Not to mention the commercials. The ads for HIV meds are especially explicit that way . . . One might conclude only black people and homosexuals get it . . .
Because Ads plays to general primitive sex psychology.
Attractive Man and Attractive Women
... I eat crayons, kindly, how is that a response to my comments?
No I am not saying that.
I am saying that a man chooses a woman to be a good wife and good mother to his children. At least he should. Sexual attraction is part of that, but not ultimately unilaterally determanitive.
determinative.
Ok... what people are missing about interracial dating . A man has to SUPPRESS those chemical responses of attraction. He has to go against his natural instincts because it might piss off people in his social circle.
What marketing people know. Is that all it takes is an attractive man and an attractive women to make a couple.
Isn't everyone at some time, attracted chemically to a person who would be WRONG for him or her? If RIGHT for him or her, the social circle may or may not be determinative??
YES a MAN has to suppress those chemical responses of attraction, that is what a man is! otherwise he will be a slave to his chemical desires, whereas he really wants and needs a good woman to be his loyal wife and to raise HIS children.
It takes a couple being attracted to each other. Not necessarily the presumed norm of physical standards of beauty.
Good luck, fren, in your love life!