What formula? That's a complete myth. Trump would have been about 23 at the time, and they were not associated.
As for E-Cat, it has a history of dubious results and lack of independent verification. I was involved in a review of the technology at Boeing and we concluded there was too much odd behavior by the founder, Rossi, to stake any position on it. My own speculation is that he may have found a way to promote spontaneous radioactivity in his base metals. Here is the history: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Energy_Catalyzer
I worked for Boeing in the late 1990's on the 777 program at the Everett, WA plant. I worked in the Systems Installation QA section on the forward and after body sections. I was a second shift QA supervisor there. I started working at Boeing right after I retired form the Navy where I flew for over 20 years as a P3 Orion flight engineer. I logged over 10K flight hours. My Navy job I will always list as my favorite job ever. Boeing is a close second place. I loved working there but we had to move for family reasons back to the east coast. Your job at Boeing sounds interesting. I would love to hear more about it.
Thanks for the interest, but it's a long story. I started as a ramjet and rocket propulsion engineer, got involved in the ROLAND 2 antiaircraft missile program, wound up shifting to system engineering and operations analysis. Subsequently worked on high-energy laser system design and analysis, military space systems, satellite defense systems, the Strategic Defense Initiative, kinetic energy projectiles, launch vehicle concepts, battle management system architecture, and lots of other stuff. I need to sit down and write my memoirs. A signal date was 1997 when Boeing merged with McDonnell-Douglas and Darth Condit ruled the realm. It was all downhill from there, both for me and the company (as we can see from the disastrous 737 MAX and the embarrassing CST-100 Starliner capsule).
I have NO background on an association between Nixon & Trump. I only said it wouldn't surprise me if there was one at this point.
I've come across numerous patents that have come out in the past three years that indicate many big technological breakthroughs have been withheld from us due to the Deep State taking over patents from inventors for 80+ years. Nikola Tesla's Wardenclyffe tower comes to mind, with many others including anti-gravity research (check out altpropulsion.com). I'm not sure I'd use wikipedia as a competent source to dispel much of anything.
As for Nixon, no idea one way or another. A quick check online shows him with more of a lawyer background than technical, but he was a Naval officer in WWII from 6/1942 to 3/1946 dealing with air transport and afterwards Bureau of Aeronautics briefly to wind down air contracts (https://pacificwrecks.com/people/veterans/nixon/index.html). Could he memorize a special formula? Who knows. There's stuff the Soviets learned from James Clerk Maxwell after he died that the US was oblivious to, so it's possible.
Of course you would have had no background. There was none. You guys need to get out of the mode of thinking that anything is possible if no one can prove otherwise. That's not science; it is magic.
So, you pass on E-cat, which is a good idea for now. You don't seem to have any alternative examples. I have heard endless claims of "secret, advanced patents," and no one produces anything. Kind of like claims for "very friendly Leprechauns." And I've seen some of these inventions. If you can make heads or tails of them, good luck and good fortune. Just because something is patented does not mean in any way that it is real (and as a holder of 9 patents, I have some experience). Tesla's Wardenclyffe tower remains an enigma, both for what he was intending and what it turned out to be (and now is gone).
As for E-Cat, you missed my statement that I investigated that in my professional capacity. From my investigation, I can testify that the Wikipedia account was fair and covered the main points. It didn't go into depth on Rossi's ambiguous demonstrations, leading to lawsuits for fraud. I don't think you can use a prejudice against Wikipedia as an argument against my own technical experience.
Nixon could remember a "formula"? The equation for Einstein's general relativity tensor (for example) is very simply expressed, but the concepts behind the terms of the equation would have been far beyond Nixon's education or experience. So, there is more to merely remembering a formula. You are just repeating a mythical story. And are you seriously claiming that the Soviet Union obtained information from James Clerk Maxwell who died in 1879? Would this be something other than what science has carried down from Maxwell?
As a professional technologist and engineer, I've read a lot about "secret technology," but over the years have come to realize there is a vast difference between mythology and reality. I don't confuse the two.
I don't have time to "check out this video, dude." If you can't say something in a sentence, I have to conclude you don't know much. Running your car on water? Good trick. Can anyone do it? That always pops up, but there is never anything behind it or any practical exploitation of it. I know how to run a car on liquid air, but not on an ordinary exhaust product.
What formula? That's a complete myth. Trump would have been about 23 at the time, and they were not associated.
As for E-Cat, it has a history of dubious results and lack of independent verification. I was involved in a review of the technology at Boeing and we concluded there was too much odd behavior by the founder, Rossi, to stake any position on it. My own speculation is that he may have found a way to promote spontaneous radioactivity in his base metals. Here is the history: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Energy_Catalyzer
I worked for Boeing in the late 1990's on the 777 program at the Everett, WA plant. I worked in the Systems Installation QA section on the forward and after body sections. I was a second shift QA supervisor there. I started working at Boeing right after I retired form the Navy where I flew for over 20 years as a P3 Orion flight engineer. I logged over 10K flight hours. My Navy job I will always list as my favorite job ever. Boeing is a close second place. I loved working there but we had to move for family reasons back to the east coast. Your job at Boeing sounds interesting. I would love to hear more about it.
Thanks for the interest, but it's a long story. I started as a ramjet and rocket propulsion engineer, got involved in the ROLAND 2 antiaircraft missile program, wound up shifting to system engineering and operations analysis. Subsequently worked on high-energy laser system design and analysis, military space systems, satellite defense systems, the Strategic Defense Initiative, kinetic energy projectiles, launch vehicle concepts, battle management system architecture, and lots of other stuff. I need to sit down and write my memoirs. A signal date was 1997 when Boeing merged with McDonnell-Douglas and Darth Condit ruled the realm. It was all downhill from there, both for me and the company (as we can see from the disastrous 737 MAX and the embarrassing CST-100 Starliner capsule).
I have NO background on an association between Nixon & Trump. I only said it wouldn't surprise me if there was one at this point.
I've come across numerous patents that have come out in the past three years that indicate many big technological breakthroughs have been withheld from us due to the Deep State taking over patents from inventors for 80+ years. Nikola Tesla's Wardenclyffe tower comes to mind, with many others including anti-gravity research (check out altpropulsion.com). I'm not sure I'd use wikipedia as a competent source to dispel much of anything.
As for Nixon, no idea one way or another. A quick check online shows him with more of a lawyer background than technical, but he was a Naval officer in WWII from 6/1942 to 3/1946 dealing with air transport and afterwards Bureau of Aeronautics briefly to wind down air contracts (https://pacificwrecks.com/people/veterans/nixon/index.html). Could he memorize a special formula? Who knows. There's stuff the Soviets learned from James Clerk Maxwell after he died that the US was oblivious to, so it's possible.
Of course you would have had no background. There was none. You guys need to get out of the mode of thinking that anything is possible if no one can prove otherwise. That's not science; it is magic.
So, you pass on E-cat, which is a good idea for now. You don't seem to have any alternative examples. I have heard endless claims of "secret, advanced patents," and no one produces anything. Kind of like claims for "very friendly Leprechauns." And I've seen some of these inventions. If you can make heads or tails of them, good luck and good fortune. Just because something is patented does not mean in any way that it is real (and as a holder of 9 patents, I have some experience). Tesla's Wardenclyffe tower remains an enigma, both for what he was intending and what it turned out to be (and now is gone).
As for E-Cat, you missed my statement that I investigated that in my professional capacity. From my investigation, I can testify that the Wikipedia account was fair and covered the main points. It didn't go into depth on Rossi's ambiguous demonstrations, leading to lawsuits for fraud. I don't think you can use a prejudice against Wikipedia as an argument against my own technical experience.
Nixon could remember a "formula"? The equation for Einstein's general relativity tensor (for example) is very simply expressed, but the concepts behind the terms of the equation would have been far beyond Nixon's education or experience. So, there is more to merely remembering a formula. You are just repeating a mythical story. And are you seriously claiming that the Soviet Union obtained information from James Clerk Maxwell who died in 1879? Would this be something other than what science has carried down from Maxwell?
As a professional technologist and engineer, I've read a lot about "secret technology," but over the years have come to realize there is a vast difference between mythology and reality. I don't confuse the two.
Well, golly. You got me. There's no way I can keep up with that kind of technical domination, despite all my training, years of experience and deep dives into technologies held back. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-ZRwlYtAMps https://archive.org/details/enjoy-the-show-directors-cut https://fightingmonarch.com https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9QbI5RPbHWo https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SiBFtwbyv44 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cTtIPBPSv0U
I don't have time to "check out this video, dude." If you can't say something in a sentence, I have to conclude you don't know much. Running your car on water? Good trick. Can anyone do it? That always pops up, but there is never anything behind it or any practical exploitation of it. I know how to run a car on liquid air, but not on an ordinary exhaust product.