"He “purposely” took the slings and arrows to set future “precedent” so that past presidents are no longer above the law. Presidents can now be prosecuted for crimes once they’ve left office.
Trump didn’t commit a single crime and knew he would never be sentenced.
Now for the Boomerang.
Have you noticed lately that a whole lot of judges are suddenly standing for the constitution instead of playing politics?
What’s changed?
Have you heard the term “enemy combatant”?
These judges are making a choice to be on the right side of history.
Do you want more evidence of that?
“Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis has been ordered by a local judge to release all communications between her office, Special Counsel Jack Smith's office, and the January 6th Committee regarding her RICO case against President Donald Trump and his allies, after she was found to have violated federal law by withholding them.”
https://www.zerohedge.com/political/fani-full-release-ordered-after-fulton-da-sat-rico-records
Fani Willis was bringing a RICO case against Trump. But now she has to turn over all communications she had with other “enemy combatants” that were helping her in a conspiracy to frame Trump.
Now she is going to be exposed and will find herself being prosecuted in a RICO case of treason.
The perfect boomerang!
This was always going to be the outcome.
This is just one sting operation. There are so many more about to be exposed.
Greatest military planning in history."
Why do people keep saying he had to create a precedent that past presidents aren’t above the law? Not having precedent wouldn’t stop taking actions against a past president breaking the law… it would just make them be the one setting the precedent. All a precedent is, is a past example.
I think the precedents are so that the public understands the evenhandedness.
Hearts and minds. These were essential to keeping the body count out of the tens of millions.