Biden is a multimillionaire, demented, has his favorite son protected. Think he gives a hoot about any of this? If he thinks about it at all, he'll just laugh at those son's of bitches. That's us, BTW.
There is language to consider. What is the legal definition of "pardon"? It is to absolve someone of a CONVICTION. A conviction, of necessity, specifies the crime and its dimensions. If there is no conviction---there is no purpose or effect of a pardon. How can you absolve something that does not exist?
The Founders meant only what the definition means, in a context where the law has run its course, not that a "pardon" should be construed as SETTING SOMEONE BEYOND THE REACH OF THE LAW.
Biden has Presidential authority to pardon any conviction under Federal law, but not to "pardon" unknown, unindicted, untried, and unconvicted crimes.
On Sunday, September 8, 1974, President Ford addressed the nation from the Oval Office to announce his decision to “grant a full, free and absolute pardon unto Richard Nixon for all offenses against the United States which he, Richard Nixon, has committed or may have committed.”
But is he exempt from being investigated and indicted, or just from having to serve the sentence? And what if he does get indicted, and later it is shown that Biden was not legally the president and therefore the pardon is null and void?
Can an illegitimate president pardon anyone?
Nope!
It should have also listed the actual crimes, not just the ones documented in kangaroo courts, but the ones well known in alt media.
Link?
https://x.com/elonmusk/status/1863504144277131672?s=61
Thank you!
Hypocrite.
Fraud vitiates everything.
Biden is a multimillionaire, demented, has his favorite son protected. Think he gives a hoot about any of this? If he thinks about it at all, he'll just laugh at those son's of bitches. That's us, BTW.
There is language to consider. What is the legal definition of "pardon"? It is to absolve someone of a CONVICTION. A conviction, of necessity, specifies the crime and its dimensions. If there is no conviction---there is no purpose or effect of a pardon. How can you absolve something that does not exist?
The Founders meant only what the definition means, in a context where the law has run its course, not that a "pardon" should be construed as SETTING SOMEONE BEYOND THE REACH OF THE LAW.
Biden has Presidential authority to pardon any conviction under Federal law, but not to "pardon" unknown, unindicted, untried, and unconvicted crimes.
Ford pardoning Nixon may have set the precedent:
https://www.fordlibrarymuseum.gov/digital-research-room/library-collections/topic-guides/nixon-pardon
But is he exempt from being investigated and indicted, or just from having to serve the sentence? And what if he does get indicted, and later it is shown that Biden was not legally the president and therefore the pardon is null and void?