Yeah I listen to Constitutional attorneys and will continue to believe them over someone on an online forum. No disrespect. There are many parts of the Constitution that are clear in their wording are not followed. 2nd Amendment, 1st Amendment, 6th Amendment, 10th Amendment. I could go on. Most of the Administrative state that has existed for 60 years is completely unconstitutional. Again it may say that, but it has never been challenged which is the point. You may be 100% correct in that it will stand and the President has full authority, but that is not my point, it never was... Maybe you should go back and read what I said.
I got your point, it was not difficult to understand but apparently mine was for you. I studied law and my Con Law professor was one of the most respected in the country. I’m some guy on a forum with a considerably greater education than most people, I’m sure.
Your “it’s never been challenged” argument is specious. By all means respond again, repeat your argument and Are welcomed to the last word on this matter. I understand there is no way to disabuse anyone of a false notion so stubbornly held. Have you read Garland? I doubt it or you could not reasonably cling to your belief. Good luck to you and I hope your further your self-educatIon of Constitutional law and actually read any applicable case law yourself.
Yeah I listen to Constitutional attorneys and will continue to believe them over someone on an online forum. No disrespect. There are many parts of the Constitution that are clear in their wording are not followed. 2nd Amendment, 1st Amendment, 6th Amendment, 10th Amendment. I could go on. Most of the Administrative state that has existed for 60 years is completely unconstitutional. Again it may say that, but it has never been challenged which is the point. You may be 100% correct in that it will stand and the President has full authority, but that is not my point, it never was... Maybe you should go back and read what I said.
I got your point, it was not difficult to understand but apparently mine was for you. I studied law and my Con Law professor was one of the most respected in the country. I’m some guy on a forum with a considerably greater education than most people, I’m sure.
Your “it’s never been challenged” argument is specious. By all means respond again, repeat your argument and Are welcomed to the last word on this matter. I understand there is no way to disabuse anyone of a false notion so stubbornly held. Have you read Garland? I doubt it or you could not reasonably cling to your belief. Good luck to you and I hope your further your self-educatIon of Constitutional law and actually read any applicable case law yourself.