Radar🚨
@RadarHits 2h
BREAKING: ‼️🤖
Google makes quantum computing breakthrough with new chip capable of solving computational problems in under 5 minutes, that would otherwise take the leading supercomputer: 10,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 years
Dec 9, 2024 · 8:40 PM UTC
For very specific types of computational problem solving and modeling, this could be true, yes. For things like machine learning or modeling complex interactions (like gravity simulations with stars/planets/etc), quantum computing can have an enormous advantage over traditional computing in part due to the ability to leverage a superposition state (instead of 0 or 1, it can be both).
Where quantum computing is disturbingly proficient is cryptography. There has been some serious concerns for several years that powerful, scalable and maintainable (there's serious maintenance with a quantum computer) quantum computers would essentially destroy modern cryptography.
As many of you have no doubt already suspected, the NSA has had quantum computing for several decades.
I've long held the belief that as the public becomes more aware of quantum computing and what it can do, it will become a very obvious case of "the haves and have nots". It's difficult for me to imagine that "they" will allow "regular people" access to powerful desktop quantum computing for a few reasons.
-Quantum computing is extremely good for AI. Imagine a regular person having a super intelligent AI on their home desk that can break through all of the decades-long CIA programming and inform the user obvious truths like JFK was murdered by members of his own government, the reality of non-human intelligences interacting with our planet and the Jab being an intentional bioweapon.
-Traditional cryptography could be defeated easily.
-Novel energy generation techniques that are free or nearly free, one of the only subjects more highly classified than the presence of non-human intelligence on our planet.
-Now, in their defense, that quantum computing could also allow backyard Einstein's to build a bad particle accelerator or rapidly perform chemical combinations on an iterative basis that allows for the creation of non-nuclear but highly explosive materials.
It's a very sticky wicket and one that I'm hoping the public will educate itself on and demand access to as maintenance (primarily super cooling) costs decrease for quantum computers. Personally, I'd rather risk having some backyard Einstein's blowing themselves up than have this incredible technology reserved for the IC and "elite" academic and corporate entities.
Maybe we did have Quantum AI on our desktop telling us these things....
Maybe it's Q
In all seriousness, I have long wondered if a key element in NCSWIC is the possession of an extremely sophisticated AI/Predictive platform as it would be the ultimate tool for game theory.
No doubt about it