You are on a forum dedicated to shine light on the darkness, exposing the secrets. You know that right?
Someone obviously know and the laws are public domain and the birth certificate is the proof after all.
So when you come on here with your people don't do things in secret bullshit, you reek of either ignorant NPC programming, or are a paid glowfag shill.
How, exactly, is my birth certificate proof of any of that stuff? My name is in initial caps, and there is not a serial number of any kind on it. I am a genealogist and know about documents.
You are not thinking. Legal maneuvers require openness in order for the deceit to be effective. If you dream up a lie, and bury it out of sight, how is that going to have any effect? Who is going to read it? Who is going to concede that it is "law"? And how could that supersede the Constitution, which is the supreme law of the land?
You are reading into "incorporation" more than is there. Cities are "incorporated" all the time, and no one gets wrapped around the axle with admiralty law. They are simply not commercial entities operating under commercial law. All of the other baggage is imaginary. Birth certificates prove nothing, except possibly that one was born and when. Whether in capital letters or not. It may come as a surprise to you, but capital letters are easier to discern and less likely to be mistaken.
I have no problem with recognizing that people do material things in secret, because there are still material results. But they don't do things in secret because in your imagination they are doing things in secret.
You allude to "your people" (meaning me). What are you talking about, specifically? Which people? Do you have any names, or are you just making it up? I see you are right on schedule with the name-calling ("NPC", "paid glowing shill"). And you never provided any rational response to my questions and objections, so I conclude this debate is over by default.
Wtf is this shit comment? No sense to do something in secret?
Glowfag alert
If nobody knows about it, how can they claim legal recourse to it? It's like they wrote it down, stuffed it in a box, and buried it.
And be a little more careful about who you call a "glowfag." It tells others more about you than it does about me.
You are on a forum dedicated to shine light on the darkness, exposing the secrets. You know that right?
Someone obviously know and the laws are public domain and the birth certificate is the proof after all.
So when you come on here with your people don't do things in secret bullshit, you reek of either ignorant NPC programming, or are a paid glowfag shill.
How, exactly, is my birth certificate proof of any of that stuff? My name is in initial caps, and there is not a serial number of any kind on it. I am a genealogist and know about documents.
You are not thinking. Legal maneuvers require openness in order for the deceit to be effective. If you dream up a lie, and bury it out of sight, how is that going to have any effect? Who is going to read it? Who is going to concede that it is "law"? And how could that supersede the Constitution, which is the supreme law of the land?
You are reading into "incorporation" more than is there. Cities are "incorporated" all the time, and no one gets wrapped around the axle with admiralty law. They are simply not commercial entities operating under commercial law. All of the other baggage is imaginary. Birth certificates prove nothing, except possibly that one was born and when. Whether in capital letters or not. It may come as a surprise to you, but capital letters are easier to discern and less likely to be mistaken.
I have no problem with recognizing that people do material things in secret, because there are still material results. But they don't do things in secret because in your imagination they are doing things in secret.
You allude to "your people" (meaning me). What are you talking about, specifically? Which people? Do you have any names, or are you just making it up? I see you are right on schedule with the name-calling ("NPC", "paid glowing shill"). And you never provided any rational response to my questions and objections, so I conclude this debate is over by default.