Jersey Futures (@JerseyFutures): "I'm one of a few groups of people who know exactly what the drones are in New Jersey. This tweet will go into the void as I have no followers, but I’ll share anyway. Please retweet for reach." (1/11)
"What you’re seeing are American-made HPGe nuclear detector drones. They can detect the presence of gamma rays miles away. But what is a gamma ray?" (2/11)
"That’d be the stuff we attribute to radiation: electromagnetic waves that penetrate you and cause cancer. HPGe drones are built to inspect nuclear sites... but these ones aren’t." (3/11)
"In the late 2000s, the DoD needed a response to the threat of dirty bombs from ISIS coming into our ports in NY and NJ." (4/11)
"They’ve been stocking up on these drones for a while. Some were deployed to Ukraine when Russia threatened the use of dirty bombs." (5/11)
"They look weird because they’re heavy and have giant Cryocoolers mounted and giant horn antennas to communicate on mmWave frequencies that can’t be jammed." (6/11)
"This is where I come in. The technology these drones use has few suppliers, both for mmWave equipment and the high-purity germanium. The same suppliers that are the backbone of my industry." (7/11)
"So what are they doing? Collecting information on how the public will react (PsyOp) and testing their ability to sweep a port city like NY for dirty bombs." (8/11)
"Jersey was chosen because we’re the closest port city to NY, and NY would be too dense for reliable mmWave comms. But why is the DoD silent?" (9/11)
"Again, because in a scenario where we have a threat of a dirty bomb and the public doesn’t yet know, the DoD needs to know how the public would react if these were deployed to sweep a city." (10/11)
"What many don’t realize is Ukraine is the reason we’re here. That was the first time we deployed them in a combat zone. But make no mistake—they’re for protecting the homeland, as the DoD bought 100s of thousands to act as swarms capable of sweeping a city." (11/11)
"I’m sorry for all the typos. I’m on the train home without my glasses and it’s very bumpy. I just had to get this off my chest as all day I’ve been hearing people genuinely afraid of the drones when they should be in awe of the capabilities we have as a country to keep us safe."
"And for nerds who know a bit about what I’m talking about: take a look at a close-up of the drones. They operate in a grid both to sweep areas and because comms are done in a mesh network operating at 200GHz+, which is very directional and requires bulky horn antennas mounted."
"Should note: I’m not a military expert but spent 1/3 of my career as an RF engineer. We’re only hired in military, telecom, and finance. I’m speculating that this is just a drill."
This is the full thread, with redundant and irrelevant text removed for clarity.
When did Russia threaten 🇺🇦 to use a dirty bomb? Why does it need a dirty bomb to begin with as they have a largest arsenal of nuclear weapons 🤔
This is about the only part that doesn't really scan for me
The "dirty bomb" is the false flag. Prime the world to accept a russian attack. In reality, all uranium sold to Russia through uranium one had samples "skimmed". Similar to fingerprints, uranium can be traced to it's origin. The "government" will link the trace uranium found to a batch sold to russia by U1. War.
You nailed it. That was so they could ff us with nukes and blame Russia back when hillary was supposed to be cheated in.
That is why when the "source" is claiming
Russian threat to use a dirty bomb in Ukraine there are questions about the "source" and the real reasons of the claims 🙄
I am aware of that, that's why I am questioning someone's claim of Russian threat to use a dirty bomb in 🇺🇦 as one of the reasons of the recent drones activities
Not Russia. Ukraine. We don't trust Ukraine not to use one.
Well, they have their DS and are under a threat to be exposed for their shady dealing with Uranium1, etc. But I am confused about a dirty bomb. Logically, they can arrange with their Chinese buddies to send a club K container to our port(s). Not to mention that I really don't recall Russia threatening to use a dirty bomb in Ukraine. I believe it was a concern the other way around
The guy is telling you he's full of shit right there. They can't be jammed, unless you're in NY, where it's too dense (a.k.a. JAMMED) to work? lol. This guy is near something but he does not know what he's talking about completely.
Gamma rays are powerful electromagnetic events. You don't need a swarm you just need altitude.
This is borderline retarded. He either means "200Mbps+" on some other frequency that he does not know, or he's just full of shit.
200Mbps is not a frequency; it is information transmission speed. "Mega bits per second"
200GHz is a frequency.
That's my point. 200GHz is not a frequency that anyone is or would be using in this application. I'm assuming he's confusing these exact two things.
Forget the nuclear weapons - they have oreshnik hypersonic missiles that are better than nukes, with no radiation to worry about. Also, there are currently no ways to defend against them.
Given those facts, any use of nukes or dirty bombs would be obvious false flag attacks attempting to put the blame to Russia.
👍 that's why I question the Russian threat to use a dirty bomb in Ukraine being one of the reasons of the drones drama.
Probably more like the deep state instead of Russia. False flag to escalate the war.
One way I could see this faux pas being excused is if this guy is basically a 'normie' who has little outside knowledge other than the MSM narrative re: Ukraine.
MSM: "Russia May use a dirty bomb."
Normie: "oh yeah remember a while back Russia threatened to use a dirty bomb..."
What he's saying could still be true and is plausibly supported by Q594, 864, 1737
Oddly enough, all three of these Q post #s each add up to 18 🤔
Related.
u/#q594 u/#q864 u/#q1737
Could be. Sum of all fears, etc. And I am very concerned that always drunk and bitter Medvedev who lost his business venues in the states and France due to Trump's sanctions (or EO dated 12.21.2017), recently went to China, probably to plot another cover up of their common dirty dealing with Clintons and Bidens. But there are other questions about this inside. I can't judge the technical part. But I also question his story about glasses. Can happen to anyone. Or can be the case that English is not his 1st language, so he's planting an excuse to prevent something like "sloppy job, mos" reaction. I am grateful that the story was found and shared, but I find it a bit fishy. Q taught us to question everything, right
Did MSM ever even report the possibility of Russia using a dirty bomb? I don't recall hearing anything about it.
That didn't sound right to me either.