What do you mean, exactly? Federal Government should “be in control of” the military? Their drones / drills / missions? Curious as to the reasoning and conclusion that the federal govt control of drones would be desirable and/or necessary. Would that not then force branches of military to close their own air space?
If someone on X could post radio traffic of an Air Force Base closing its own air space for “unknown UAP” activity, I would think that branch of military has a purpose for that action, traffic, and language used. Nevertheless, I’m not sure why or how the Fed govt would be sovereign over military since military law is not subject to federal law, at baseline.
If our government was in control of them the airbases wouldn't be shutting down.
That might be the very point.
Looks like the govt is at war with itself.
What do you mean, exactly? Federal Government should “be in control of” the military? Their drones / drills / missions? Curious as to the reasoning and conclusion that the federal govt control of drones would be desirable and/or necessary. Would that not then force branches of military to close their own air space?
If someone on X could post radio traffic of an Air Force Base closing its own air space for “unknown UAP” activity, I would think that branch of military has a purpose for that action, traffic, and language used. Nevertheless, I’m not sure why or how the Fed govt would be sovereign over military since military law is not subject to federal law, at baseline.
The airbases would shut down flight ops if they need the drones in the airspace sea ching for whatever it is they're searching for.
The govt has the capability to jam anything and everything that operates electronically.