It literally does not. If you bothered to read the NRC report and knew what the actual source is that's been reported as lost. It is important as far as hazmat control is concerned. Entirely insignificant in regard to health and safety and a dirty bomb. Or this ridiculous perpetuation of radiation sniffing drones. How exactly does a tiny radioactive source that poses no danger unless ingested explain the activation of an army of drones that supposedly sniff out radiation. Lol I'd love to hear the answer you come up with.
Yes, the small rad amount is a non starter. A question I would like an answer to is, how much rad danger would trigger this kind of drone response?
The container arrived heavily damaged. Not a crash but was damaged. Perhaps when the material was stolen, the breach of the container received heavy damage. A lot of work for what they report.
Which has to be true because we are never lied to by them.
Explains the drones
No it doesnt
it literally does
It literally does not. If you bothered to read the NRC report and knew what the actual source is that's been reported as lost. It is important as far as hazmat control is concerned. Entirely insignificant in regard to health and safety and a dirty bomb. Or this ridiculous perpetuation of radiation sniffing drones. How exactly does a tiny radioactive source that poses no danger unless ingested explain the activation of an army of drones that supposedly sniff out radiation. Lol I'd love to hear the answer you come up with.
Yes, the small rad amount is a non starter. A question I would like an answer to is, how much rad danger would trigger this kind of drone response?
The container arrived heavily damaged. Not a crash but was damaged. Perhaps when the material was stolen, the breach of the container received heavy damage. A lot of work for what they report.
Which has to be true because we are never lied to by them.