It literally does not. If you bothered to read the NRC report and knew what the actual source is that's been reported as lost. It is important as far as hazmat control is concerned. Entirely insignificant in regard to health and safety and a dirty bomb. Or this ridiculous perpetuation of radiation sniffing drones. How exactly does a tiny radioactive source that poses no danger unless ingested explain the activation of an army of drones that supposedly sniff out radiation. Lol I'd love to hear the answer you come up with.
Yes, the small rad amount is a non starter. A question I would like an answer to is, how much rad danger would trigger this kind of drone response?
The container arrived heavily damaged. Not a crash but was damaged. Perhaps when the material was stolen, the breach of the container received heavy damage. A lot of work for what they report.
Which has to be true because we are never lied to by them.
I didn't see anything describing the container was damaged. That detail is of importance and if it was the shipping container, overpack, or the or the DOT 7A Type A container. As far as a threshold that really can't be answered since there isn't a response, at least public, proposing drone sniffers en masse.. But immediate responses and recovery, it's usually a very significant amount that I've ever seen.i.e. Cesium-137 experimental medical source at 3800 Ci Last one I worked on.
No it doesnt
it literally does
It literally does not. If you bothered to read the NRC report and knew what the actual source is that's been reported as lost. It is important as far as hazmat control is concerned. Entirely insignificant in regard to health and safety and a dirty bomb. Or this ridiculous perpetuation of radiation sniffing drones. How exactly does a tiny radioactive source that poses no danger unless ingested explain the activation of an army of drones that supposedly sniff out radiation. Lol I'd love to hear the answer you come up with.
You're right, federal bureaucrats would never lie on a report.
You obviously don't understand how the NRC report and notification system works. Lol understandable.
Yes, the small rad amount is a non starter. A question I would like an answer to is, how much rad danger would trigger this kind of drone response?
The container arrived heavily damaged. Not a crash but was damaged. Perhaps when the material was stolen, the breach of the container received heavy damage. A lot of work for what they report.
Which has to be true because we are never lied to by them.
I didn't see anything describing the container was damaged. That detail is of importance and if it was the shipping container, overpack, or the or the DOT 7A Type A container. As far as a threshold that really can't be answered since there isn't a response, at least public, proposing drone sniffers en masse.. But immediate responses and recovery, it's usually a very significant amount that I've ever seen.i.e. Cesium-137 experimental medical source at 3800 Ci Last one I worked on.
Possible distraction for something more severe. My statement was a probability
That very could be the case if these "drones" are being deployed to detect something.