I'm curious why nuke sniffing military intelligence devices is easier to digest then aliens when both are in the same spectrum of unknown, unconfirmed. If there are drones that can detect radioactive materials in the way the footage is shown for these " drones" then this is physics breaking technology and go's way beyond what our current understanding of light and material properties are. That's as far fetched or as grandeur of a theory as alien invasion.
Well, if it was a foreign state actor, then the media would be all over it like White on Rice:
It's the *****ns!!! We must defend our country!! etc.
We are told it's nothing, so I tend to think it is some intelligence gathering, all above board, except they are not elling us What data. That's why I think it is something Radioactive, and possibly Dirty, as in leaky. The story that came out early on in the piece was that some radiological medical material 'went missing'. But I have also seen something about a dirty bomb lab that was busted in Kharkov, during the beginning of the SMO, evidence from the general who was just offed in Moscow.
So maybe there was a bit of international NOTSEE blackmail going on?
I definitely know drones can have sensitive thermal imaging, that perhaps can 'see' through walls, and metal. But definitely, any motor lights up like a Christmas tree, and people too.
Furthermore, there is LIDAR imaging, which may pick up anomalies on the acual surface - for example 'holes' to underground tunnels or deep basements can be identified - so LIDAR 'sees' through structures. That technology is used even by local councils to extablish 'flood levels' so it's not new tech.
Furthemore, nuke-sniffing is not new either, formerly done on helicopters, who had to swoop down to sample the air. So, they kind of have to get down low, it's not something that can be done via satellite, for example. Having them 'on drones' is just a good idea, because they can fly low, without risking a pilot.
It's suspicious for sure. I'm well aware of the capabilities you have described for detection methods and is more likely what would be the purpose such as LIDAR. Looking for what, I or anyone doesn't know yet. Btw dirty does not mean leaky it means uncharacterized. As far as nuke sniffing and air sampling that is very specific conditions it would be used in. Key words their is air sampling, that is a physical collection and assay and not remote detection analysis which is the speculation where a drone is just sitting in the air "scanning" for nukes. Lol.
If that's what is occurring then that is a major problem as it would indicate radioactive particulates in the air, above ground and massive area would be in serious jeopardy right now, and folks better start making arrangements, dependant on the intensity and type of this fictional material being speculated.
Again nuke sniffing, with some floating craft to find radio-isotopes is not a thing, and if it is, mankind's understanding of physics will need to be reevaluated and changed.
I'm curious why nuke sniffing military intelligence devices is easier to digest then aliens when both are in the same spectrum of unknown, unconfirmed. If there are drones that can detect radioactive materials in the way the footage is shown for these " drones" then this is physics breaking technology and go's way beyond what our current understanding of light and material properties are. That's as far fetched or as grandeur of a theory as alien invasion.
Well, if it was a foreign state actor, then the media would be all over it like White on Rice:
We are told it's nothing, so I tend to think it is some intelligence gathering, all above board, except they are not elling us What data. That's why I think it is something Radioactive, and possibly Dirty, as in leaky. The story that came out early on in the piece was that some radiological medical material 'went missing'. But I have also seen something about a dirty bomb lab that was busted in Kharkov, during the beginning of the SMO, evidence from the general who was just offed in Moscow.
So maybe there was a bit of international NOTSEE blackmail going on?
I definitely know drones can have sensitive thermal imaging, that perhaps can 'see' through walls, and metal. But definitely, any motor lights up like a Christmas tree, and people too.
Furthermore, there is LIDAR imaging, which may pick up anomalies on the acual surface - for example 'holes' to underground tunnels or deep basements can be identified - so LIDAR 'sees' through structures. That technology is used even by local councils to extablish 'flood levels' so it's not new tech.
Furthemore, nuke-sniffing is not new either, formerly done on helicopters, who had to swoop down to sample the air. So, they kind of have to get down low, it's not something that can be done via satellite, for example. Having them 'on drones' is just a good idea, because they can fly low, without risking a pilot.
But they are not hiding.
It's suspicious for sure. I'm well aware of the capabilities you have described for detection methods and is more likely what would be the purpose such as LIDAR. Looking for what, I or anyone doesn't know yet. Btw dirty does not mean leaky it means uncharacterized. As far as nuke sniffing and air sampling that is very specific conditions it would be used in. Key words their is air sampling, that is a physical collection and assay and not remote detection analysis which is the speculation where a drone is just sitting in the air "scanning" for nukes. Lol.
If that's what is occurring then that is a major problem as it would indicate radioactive particulates in the air, above ground and massive area would be in serious jeopardy right now, and folks better start making arrangements, dependant on the intensity and type of this fictional material being speculated.
Again nuke sniffing, with some floating craft to find radio-isotopes is not a thing, and if it is, mankind's understanding of physics will need to be reevaluated and changed.