California stopped issuing bonds when Reagan was governor, so every administration since Reagan's second term has been illegitimate, including this one that just started at the beginning of December: https://gwsandiego.net/blog/?p=2219.
Plus, a lot of legislators have been working unlawfully without oaths, and a lot of laws have to be voided as they were fraudulently implemented: https://gwsandiego.net/blog/?p=2931
I wish the military would step in and seize control already.
I am not saying that administrations previous to Reagan may have been illegitimate and/or corrupt.
I am saying that at the end of Reagan's first term, the State of CA said "F-You, we'll do whatever we want and laws don't apply to us" when it came to the issuance of bonds. Bonds are required by both federal and state law. By no longer having government employees procure bonds, the military has every right to step in because there is not one single legitimate state level employee.
Bonds aren't required for a state government to run. Bonds may be used to operate while in debt, but they are not required. I bet states like FL operate fine without bonds.
Per both Federal and California law, surety bonds are required to be issued on every government employee. This is codified in California Government Code Section 1450 – 1463.
CA Gov't Code Section 1460 says: "Every officer with whom official bonds are filed shall carefully keep and preserve the bonds. He shall give certified copies thereof to any person demanding copies, upon being paid the same fees as are allowed by law for certified copies of papers in other cases.”
Per CGCS 1455, these surety bonds are supposed to be filed in the Secretary of State’s office (SOS).
California stopped issuing bonds when Reagan was governor, so every administration since Reagan's second term has been illegitimate, including this one that just started at the beginning of December: https://gwsandiego.net/blog/?p=2219.
Plus, a lot of legislators have been working unlawfully without oaths, and a lot of laws have to be voided as they were fraudulently implemented: https://gwsandiego.net/blog/?p=2931
I wish the military would step in and seize control already.
Pat & Moonbeam were both Getty owned as is Newscum. So your "illegitiment" timeline may be a bit off.
Earl Warren, before them was Dewey's VP in the 1948 oopsie. This shit is old.
I am not saying that administrations previous to Reagan may have been illegitimate and/or corrupt.
I am saying that at the end of Reagan's first term, the State of CA said "F-You, we'll do whatever we want and laws don't apply to us" when it came to the issuance of bonds. Bonds are required by both federal and state law. By no longer having government employees procure bonds, the military has every right to step in because there is not one single legitimate state level employee.
Bonds aren't required for a state government to run. Bonds may be used to operate while in debt, but they are not required. I bet states like FL operate fine without bonds.
Bonds are required per California law:
Per both Federal and California law, surety bonds are required to be issued on every government employee. This is codified in California Government Code Section 1450 – 1463.
CA Gov't Code Section 1460 says: "Every officer with whom official bonds are filed shall carefully keep and preserve the bonds. He shall give certified copies thereof to any person demanding copies, upon being paid the same fees as are allowed by law for certified copies of papers in other cases.”
Per CGCS 1455, these surety bonds are supposed to be filed in the Secretary of State’s office (SOS).
Bonds ? of an illegitimate currency ? lol Party may be larger than just Commiefornia.
When congress failed from lack of a quorum , who stepped in ?
Put another way : When the American government failed who replaced it ?