Do we all just believe this eyepatch is real? I want to see what's under it. Wouldn't be surprised if it's all an act.

X specially a faggot.

LOL. True.

So I got stuck defending Crenshaw yesterday, for which I thank everyone, as I can’t stand him, but truth and doing things the right way matter more than ousting someone we don’t like.

If the numbers in that post are correct, he would indeed be crooked. Do we have sources other than Twitter claims, because these numbers are nowhere near the numbers I was seeing yesterday.

https://greatawakening.win/p/19A0tUvX67/x/c/4ZHjyUXenzS?d=50

If we think this is true, let’s get some solid evidence on it and get him gone, but we can’t just go around making cheap claims with no sauce.

• His dirty stock trading profits him ABOVE Pelosi’s trading! — by the numbers GGRocks posted to me from another thread (https://greatawakening.win/p/19A0tUvX67/x/c/4ZHjydn3cfM), he’s only about 40% above average, which isn’t crazy, and well below Drunken Aunt Nancy.
• Today, his net-worth is $4.4 million+ — the numbers I saw placed him between 1.4 and 2.2, which are also not ridiculous, and frankly neither is 4.4, unless that all happened in 6 years. A significant chunk of it appears to be in his house, while his stocks allegedly made up about $300-350k
• In 2021, Crenshaw voted on a National vax database, to keep track of who did/did not get the jab. He pushed to keep the Covid jab mandatory in the military. — this one is believable. What was the bill name?
• Crenshaw’s campaign paid his wife’s firm “Pink Cilantro” more than $350,000, and according to the FDR, reported it as ‘spouse salary.’ — looks true, but details matter - https://hotair.com/jazz-shaw/2022/10/17/did-dan-crenshaw-get-caught-paying-his-wifes-firm-with-campaign-money-n503917 - who seems to have cited their sources appropriately

My sources for his stock trades are in the other thread. We won’t get rid of a corruptocrat with false claims. His screaming at detractors is a very bad look as far as being innocent.

We posted a few days ago that this is seen as a top-tier research board. Whether the claims against Crenshaw are right or wrong, let’s do a good job of proving our work.

Why defend him? Because I want any claims against him to stick. Throwing poo wildly just makes us look bad. At that point, if he’s against us, our claims are worthless, and if he’s for us (Ha!) we accused him falsely and took down an ally.

Edit: Aaaaand a downdoot for testing claims and pointing to sauce. Let’s go by emotion!

Thanks for the numbers..

Not sure mental but definitely greedy and selfish.

Guess not for some.

I would love to see it.

Sorry. Brain-Dead did not know.

Cryclops you say?

Cry more. I hope.

LOL

I don't know. I. would guess 2026

LOL

LOL