Income Tax Debate
(files.catbox.moe)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (48)
sorted by:
This is why I should never post. The thing is they don't do that. When you cite the actual law and not talk bullshit like you think people do, they listen and follow the law. But I wouldn't expect you to know or listen or even spend any time reading about this topic. You already know...
How would somebody go about stopping their employer from taking taxes out of their paycheck; or is there a way to get refunded all the taxes that the employer takes out and gives to the government?
That is a great question. I don't know that there is a way to stop an employer from taking "taxes" from a paycheck. But there is definitely a way to have those "taxes" returned. Buy the book. Read. Look at the evidence. Do NOT depend on me to to guide you because I won't. Do your own research.
A post is exactly what you should do, so that you can help people. Even if someone understands the law, how many people do you think can afford to risk "citing the law" to federal agencies as their "get out of jail free" card. It doesn't work that way either. And if it does, you'd be helping by explaining that touchpoint, because that's the crux of the matter. More power to you if you do this stuff balls out.
I'll tell you how it has worked for me. The thing is when you file a tax return, you are swearing under penalty of perjury that all the information you submitted is true and correct, and you are effectively waiving your 5th Amendment right to not self-incriminate. There is no law that can compel ordinary citizens to provide ANY information that could potentially incriminate them. Its a fallacy that taxes are mandatory. Its actually a donation and when you file a tax return you are declaring your gift to the federal government.
I cited the website. Buy the book and look at the success stories. Realize what they are doing and why it works. I don't say this to argue a point or to measure it against other methods. There are plenty of those...
I posted this to explain what worked for me and why. You are free to go explore this for yourself and make up your own mind.
If what you say is true I should be in jail. Yet I am not and there are no threats of jail either.
I had already saved your link for further reading, so please consider my jest in fun and to advance the conversation. Tbf, not everyone can take such a deep dive to understand, and if they did, the dig still apparently doesn't address the touchpoint I raised above. I do know people who have been audited several times. The way you're describing it, the audited parties only need to cite the law and nothing will happen to them. Have you been challenged directly by the IRS? Audited?
You want to see the letters they sent me? What do you want exactly? I have the same evidence the site I posted has. It works. Believe whatever you want I honestly don't care. I posted only to show there is a path. Not all paths are the same.
Read the book. Explore the website. Compare to what you currently know.
I really don't care what you do. If I am a lie then so be it. Prove it. I know my stuff proves what I say. Prove yours!