Agreed. But people need to understand here that voicing dissent is an important part of the process. If this was 5D chess, the people letting their concerns be known loud and clear was the intended result.
There is also a fine line between dissatisfaction on an issue and full blown dooming or panic. Just because someone is exhibiting concern, does not necessarily mean they are engaging in the latter.
Well, some people have been pretty quick to throw them under the bus without reasoning it through more, insisting that they're "compromised" or "the enemy".
Agreed. But people need to understand here that voicing dissent is an important part of the process. If this was 5D chess, the people letting their concerns be known loud and clear was the intended result.
There is also a fine line between dissatisfaction on an issue and full blown dooming or panic. Just because someone is exhibiting concern, does not necessarily mean they are engaging in the latter.
Well, some people have been pretty quick to throw them under the bus without reasoning it through more, insisting that they're "compromised" or "the enemy".
Not a ton, but some.
I agree. Of course a more rational approach is better. But I also think it's better to be more distrusting of those in power rather than the opposite.
I am 100% for distrust!
Agreed fren, maximum distrust towards everyone other than Jesus Christ himself.
Id say a ton.
Reacting without thinking is not part of the process and that is what happened here. Dissent without discernment is harmful to the Awakening.
Principles are principles. You don't have to think to tell someone you disagree on a matter of policy.