You can reuse assets. Why would you kill one of your agents when you dont have to.? She doesnt even have to hide, a haircut and makeup and 99.999 percent of the public wouldnt even know her if they passed her on the street, especially since they assume she is dead.
There is a big difference between killing innocent people ala 9/11 vs killing people that you control.
No examples of this. It is an imaginary scenario. 99.999% of the public wouldn't recognize her as anyone if they passed her on the street, even if they didn't know she was dead. Who knew her anyway? A family of maybe 10 members? In a population of 350 million, that would mean 99.99999714% of the public wouldn't recognize her if she were alive. Dye her hair. Add a mustache. Do you begin to see that the trouble to obtain an unrecognizable "asset" is not worth even a penny?
This might be one of you most asinine replies ever.
I think you get a kick out of seeing how many people you can gaslight with your nonsensical ramblings.
It costs time and money to train assets/ operatives Why would you kill them if you dont have to.?
You even claim that it was a skit turned tradgedy, so in that scenario they didnt intend to kill her at all. Seems YOUR own theory bolsters the idea that they didnt want her to die.....
So train them off the street. No need to spend time and money to set up a Passionspiel requiring thousands of extras and an unreasonable risk of homicide. You are just making a special plea to rescue this idea from ridicule.
Neither you nor I have any idea how the play was supposed to go down, assuming there was one.
You and this video editor are doing the gaslighting. No evidence whatsoever, just an insistent interpretation of a Rorschach blot. "Look, it's a butterfly."
You can reuse assets. Why would you kill one of your agents when you dont have to.? She doesnt even have to hide, a haircut and makeup and 99.999 percent of the public wouldnt even know her if they passed her on the street, especially since they assume she is dead.
There is a big difference between killing innocent people ala 9/11 vs killing people that you control.
No examples of this. It is an imaginary scenario. 99.999% of the public wouldn't recognize her as anyone if they passed her on the street, even if they didn't know she was dead. Who knew her anyway? A family of maybe 10 members? In a population of 350 million, that would mean 99.99999714% of the public wouldn't recognize her if she were alive. Dye her hair. Add a mustache. Do you begin to see that the trouble to obtain an unrecognizable "asset" is not worth even a penny?
LOL...keep shillling shill.
This might be one of you most asinine replies ever.
I think you get a kick out of seeing how many people you can gaslight with your nonsensical ramblings.
It costs time and money to train assets/ operatives Why would you kill them if you dont have to.?
You even claim that it was a skit turned tradgedy, so in that scenario they didnt intend to kill her at all. Seems YOUR own theory bolsters the idea that they didnt want her to die.....
So train them off the street. No need to spend time and money to set up a Passionspiel requiring thousands of extras and an unreasonable risk of homicide. You are just making a special plea to rescue this idea from ridicule.
Neither you nor I have any idea how the play was supposed to go down, assuming there was one.
You and this video editor are doing the gaslighting. No evidence whatsoever, just an insistent interpretation of a Rorschach blot. "Look, it's a butterfly."
lol