But..... There's one video where the nose of the plane does poke though, and emerges on the other side for one or two frames. Oopsies! People use that as a proof of CGI. Just sayin. I wasn't there. I listen to everything and say, Hmmmmmmm.....
True, that one is very weird, and it's also visible from another angle close up, but i can't find that one. But you can kind of see it in this angle. Pause the vid and you can use comma and period to go frame by frame. I guess it could've been part of an engine, since the Tower had gaps in between the steel pillars, and the office space is completely open from one wall to the other except for the small core of the building. However the debris is at the front of the explosion, and does slightly look similar to the shape of the nose in the news angle.
The more I look at it the more I think it is just a combination of wall debris combined with the plane, and they have the same height and shape as the tube of the fuselage because that's where the majority of the force comes from before the fuel explodes. And you can see it's moving slower than the speed of the plane. And it might even be a thin slice of the nose of the plane being shredded but the cross section makes it through the gap in the wall.
However I also wouldn't put it passed them to deliberately do CGI like that just to poison the well, and fool people into thinking that shot is a CGI nose, therefore all footage must've been CGI. It really helps drive people away from looking into 9/11 because the no plane theory doesn't make sense, since 10,000+ people saw the planes with their own eyes, and 100s filmed it with their own cameras.
But..... There's one video where the nose of the plane does poke though, and emerges on the other side for one or two frames. Oopsies! People use that as a proof of CGI. Just sayin. I wasn't there. I listen to everything and say, Hmmmmmmm.....
True, that one is very weird, and it's also visible from another angle close up, but i can't find that one. But you can kind of see it in this angle. Pause the vid and you can use comma and period to go frame by frame. I guess it could've been part of an engine, since the Tower had gaps in between the steel pillars, and the office space is completely open from one wall to the other except for the small core of the building. However the debris is at the front of the explosion, and does slightly look similar to the shape of the nose in the news angle.
The more I look at it the more I think it is just a combination of wall debris combined with the plane, and they have the same height and shape as the tube of the fuselage because that's where the majority of the force comes from before the fuel explodes. And you can see it's moving slower than the speed of the plane. And it might even be a thin slice of the nose of the plane being shredded but the cross section makes it through the gap in the wall.
However I also wouldn't put it passed them to deliberately do CGI like that just to poison the well, and fool people into thinking that shot is a CGI nose, therefore all footage must've been CGI. It really helps drive people away from looking into 9/11 because the no plane theory doesn't make sense, since 10,000+ people saw the planes with their own eyes, and 100s filmed it with their own cameras.