GA doesn't claim to be a free speech community. The right side bar makes it clear that this is an elite research board for Q supporters.
Your selective editing of Q Drop 725 misrepresents what Q said. Here is a link to read the full text of the full drop: https://qalerts.app/?n=725
The fight against ISIS and MS13 is a global fight, and Q elaborates on this in these drops:
https://qalerts.app/?q=MS13
Here is an excerpt from Q Drop 484:
Who created ISIS?
Who controlled ISIS?
What was the purpose of ISIS?
Who is MS13?
Why were known MS13 members released after capture?
Who controls MS13?
Who FUNDS MS13?
Hard to swallow.
Watch the news.
Stages.
Q
I felt silenced and, as an American, that made me angry. I'm sorry for the negativity, I meant I was being critical of Trump, and I never meant to misrepresent by paraphrasing, rather to show my misunderstanding through my paraphrasing.
This is the quote, in full, that I grabbed from the side of this page:
"Those who cannot understand that we cannot simply start arresting w/o first: ensuring the safety & well-being of the population shifting the narrative removing those in DC through resignation to ensure success defeating ISIS/MS13 to prevent fail-safes freezing assets to remove network-to-network abilities kill off COC to prevent top-down comms/org, etc. etc. should not be participating in discussions." Q
I am one of those who cannot understand that we cannot simply start arresting. Therefore, according to this quote, I am one of those who should not be participating in discussions.
I'm certain many people agree. But I'm confused because you said there's no "don't arrest anyone" logic, yet that contradicts with my understanding of "we cannot simply start arresting".
Maybe I bring negativity through my skepticism because I view this logic as a stall tactic. It's a lethargic, do-nothing attitude because the existence of Q implies a deep counter-conspiracy working in our favor.
So let me ask, do you think that I should not be participating in discussions due to my (mis)understanding of this? And, if so, do you think that aligns with American values?
Based on your reference to Q as "your idol" it looks like there's more to why you were banned than just asking questions.
A quick search for Jan 6th yields lots of results: https://greatawakening.win/search?params=Jan+6th&community=GreatAwakening
GA doesn't claim to be a free speech community. The right side bar makes it clear that this is an elite research board for Q supporters.
Your selective editing of Q Drop 725 misrepresents what Q said. Here is a link to read the full text of the full drop: https://qalerts.app/?n=725
The fight against ISIS and MS13 is a global fight, and Q elaborates on this in these drops: https://qalerts.app/?q=MS13
Here is an excerpt from Q Drop 484:
There's no "don't arrest anyone" logic.
Many will be arrested, tried, and convicted. There are currently almost 550,000 sealed indictments: https://greatawakening.win/p/199i42RUUp/-another-5357-sealed-indictments/c/
Timing and sequence are key. Moves and counter moves.
Asking questions in good faith is welcome. Negativity is not.
Well said
I felt silenced and, as an American, that made me angry. I'm sorry for the negativity, I meant I was being critical of Trump, and I never meant to misrepresent by paraphrasing, rather to show my misunderstanding through my paraphrasing.
This is the quote, in full, that I grabbed from the side of this page:
I am one of those who cannot understand that we cannot simply start arresting. Therefore, according to this quote, I am one of those who should not be participating in discussions.
I'm certain many people agree. But I'm confused because you said there's no "don't arrest anyone" logic, yet that contradicts with my understanding of "we cannot simply start arresting".
Maybe I bring negativity through my skepticism because I view this logic as a stall tactic. It's a lethargic, do-nothing attitude because the existence of Q implies a deep counter-conspiracy working in our favor.
So let me ask, do you think that I should not be participating in discussions due to my (mis)understanding of this? And, if so, do you think that aligns with American values?