Why wouldn't a God that is beyond our comprehension create life outside of earth beyond or comprehension? ...Q told us in plain terms that there are. Plus there are at least a million points of evidence in the throughout all history. Think outside the box. Saying there aren't ETs is almost as bad as saying the earth is flat at this point.
I know I'm in a minority to say this, but when I read Q's response, I took it differently from you and others. The question asked was actually 2 questions, and they are opposite. "Are we alone? Roswell?" The first question is clear. The second question I infer to be, "Was the Roswell incident actually an extraterrestrial lifeform that crashed on Earth?"
Q provided only one answer. When I read it, I took it as no to the second question. Q followed it up with, "Consider the vastness of space." I did consider the vastness of space, and as anyone who has studied the most basic astronomy knows, the distances are so great that it is inconceivable to the human mind, given the limitations of travel approaching light speed, for alien life forms, if they even DID exist, to visit us. Was Roswell legit? No. Consider the vastness of space. Now, if Einstein was wrong, and it turns out that accelerating up to and beyond the speed of light was possible, that would open up the possibility not only of aliens visiting us, but a whole lot of other weird stuff. And maybe Einstein was wrong, who knows? But I don't think Q's answer is as plain as you mentioned.
That’s fair that there could be an alternate interpretation.
However, I believe Q was answering the first question. I have only ever heard someone respond about the size of space and universe with the implication that the universe is so unbelievably massive that the chances of us being alone are minuscule.
Also, nothing can move through space and time faster than light. However, there is no known limit to how quickly space can expand and contract. If you are able to contact space in front of you and expand space behind you then you would be able to reach a destination faster than it would take light to travel there.
Earth is not flat, it is likely a half-sphere domed terrarium (enclosed) with Polaris at the very center of the “dome” and a precessing, round habitable zone that rotates 30 degrees around Polaris every 2,160 years, taking 2160 x 12 = 25,920 years to complete the ‘Great Year’. There is more to the ‘Earth’ than the realm we see (likely about 3x more land, not including underground habitations). ETs may be from outside our land, i.e. extra terrestrial, and some may be humans.
All documented on Praugue celestial clock (despite the mods) which shows we entered Age of Aquarius on 18FEB2020. This means Spring Equinox sun location is at equator under Aquarius constellation (N.A. Spring). https://thirdeyetraveller.com/prague-astronomical-clock/
I think you are purposefully twisting Q's words here. Clearly OP was asking about aliens. Q answered that question. Space is too large for other life to not be a mathematical certainty.
What goverment classification would be given to 'A powerful creator beyond our comprehension'? That doesn't make any sense. You're hearing hoofbeats and thinking zebras.
“Space” may be a smaller bubble within a larger bubble like nested Russian Matroyshka dolls. Earth is either the 1st smallest or 3rd smallest bubble, depending on whether or not Mercury and Venus are “real planets”. In this model the Earth bubble sits on Mars round plane under half dome which sits on Jupiter (spot is Mars?), etc. to Neptune.
Clearly we are not flying through space as star constellations NEVER change from all points on Earth. This is impossible if we were moving.
ASSUMPTION: “planets” are x-ray type of projected images of additional layers below us into the sky, so image of “Mars”, below Earth, includes Earth in the projected image since we are above it. Similarly, Jupiter, below Mars would show Mars on its projected image (the Red Spot?). Venus would be above us with Mercury above the Venus plane. Don’t know how to deal with them.
It is one model that matches observations and measurements, but may be only part of the “big picture” we are not allowed to see. In person worldwide travel is required to verify additional measurements, but not possible right now.
“Good news” is that a physical place called ‘the planet Mars’ may be both accessible and habitable, but not the way NASA tells us.“Going to Mars” may turn out to be “breaking out of the prison planet” which is currently prohibited to non-elite humans. So, go Elon, I need more data on this “Mars thing”. It may end up being soft disclosure. In the “nested bubble model” Mars is about 250,000x the square miles area of Earth with half of that land.
Vastness of space doesn't need to lead to aliens.
Vastness of space can lead to an almighty powerful Creator. One beyond our comprehension. Like the God of the Bible.
Why wouldn't a God that is beyond our comprehension create life outside of earth beyond or comprehension? ...Q told us in plain terms that there are. Plus there are at least a million points of evidence in the throughout all history. Think outside the box. Saying there aren't ETs is almost as bad as saying the earth is flat at this point.
I know I'm in a minority to say this, but when I read Q's response, I took it differently from you and others. The question asked was actually 2 questions, and they are opposite. "Are we alone? Roswell?" The first question is clear. The second question I infer to be, "Was the Roswell incident actually an extraterrestrial lifeform that crashed on Earth?"
Q provided only one answer. When I read it, I took it as no to the second question. Q followed it up with, "Consider the vastness of space." I did consider the vastness of space, and as anyone who has studied the most basic astronomy knows, the distances are so great that it is inconceivable to the human mind, given the limitations of travel approaching light speed, for alien life forms, if they even DID exist, to visit us. Was Roswell legit? No. Consider the vastness of space. Now, if Einstein was wrong, and it turns out that accelerating up to and beyond the speed of light was possible, that would open up the possibility not only of aliens visiting us, but a whole lot of other weird stuff. And maybe Einstein was wrong, who knows? But I don't think Q's answer is as plain as you mentioned.
That’s fair that there could be an alternate interpretation.
However, I believe Q was answering the first question. I have only ever heard someone respond about the size of space and universe with the implication that the universe is so unbelievably massive that the chances of us being alone are minuscule.
Also, nothing can move through space and time faster than light. However, there is no known limit to how quickly space can expand and contract. If you are able to contact space in front of you and expand space behind you then you would be able to reach a destination faster than it would take light to travel there.
Earth is not flat, it is likely a half-sphere domed terrarium (enclosed) with Polaris at the very center of the “dome” and a precessing, round habitable zone that rotates 30 degrees around Polaris every 2,160 years, taking 2160 x 12 = 25,920 years to complete the ‘Great Year’. There is more to the ‘Earth’ than the realm we see (likely about 3x more land, not including underground habitations). ETs may be from outside our land, i.e. extra terrestrial, and some may be humans.
All documented on Praugue celestial clock (despite the mods) which shows we entered Age of Aquarius on 18FEB2020. This means Spring Equinox sun location is at equator under Aquarius constellation (N.A. Spring). https://thirdeyetraveller.com/prague-astronomical-clock/
Sigh...
Agreed...Heliocentric "prison planet" is quite captivating. I'm getting out ASAP, and probably not coming back.
lol, fail.
I think you are purposefully twisting Q's words here. Clearly OP was asking about aliens. Q answered that question. Space is too large for other life to not be a mathematical certainty.
What goverment classification would be given to 'A powerful creator beyond our comprehension'? That doesn't make any sense. You're hearing hoofbeats and thinking zebras.
“Space” may be a smaller bubble within a larger bubble like nested Russian Matroyshka dolls. Earth is either the 1st smallest or 3rd smallest bubble, depending on whether or not Mercury and Venus are “real planets”. In this model the Earth bubble sits on Mars round plane under half dome which sits on Jupiter (spot is Mars?), etc. to Neptune.
Clearly we are not flying through space as star constellations NEVER change from all points on Earth. This is impossible if we were moving.
Where do you come up with this stuff?
ASSUMPTION: “planets” are x-ray type of projected images of additional layers below us into the sky, so image of “Mars”, below Earth, includes Earth in the projected image since we are above it. Similarly, Jupiter, below Mars would show Mars on its projected image (the Red Spot?). Venus would be above us with Mercury above the Venus plane. Don’t know how to deal with them.
It is one model that matches observations and measurements, but may be only part of the “big picture” we are not allowed to see. In person worldwide travel is required to verify additional measurements, but not possible right now.
“Good news” is that a physical place called ‘the planet Mars’ may be both accessible and habitable, but not the way NASA tells us.“Going to Mars” may turn out to be “breaking out of the prison planet” which is currently prohibited to non-elite humans. So, go Elon, I need more data on this “Mars thing”. It may end up being soft disclosure. In the “nested bubble model” Mars is about 250,000x the square miles area of Earth with half of that land.