BATTLEGROUND GREENLAND: Denmark’s Frederiksen Gains Support of Germany’s Scholz, While Macron’s France Offers To Send Soldiers, ...
As geopolitical tensions rise, Denmark's Prime Minister Frederiksen secures Germany's backing while France prepares military support for Greenland. Meanwhile, UK leader Starmer stands firm against intervention. Read more about this unfolding narrative.
Icy or Fiery? Which one is it NYT and FT? Get your 4 am talking points straightened out or no one will trust the MSM!
I suppose NYT and FT reporters were in the room? [doubt]
What sources?
Pepes want to know. We saw what happened when a perfect phone-call made grounds for impeachment because of 'sources'.
It sure seems like this trip around there are far fewer loose lips. That, or Trump is just moving so fast that the news breaks before leaks occur.
And because the media have proven to be such massive compulsive liars, no one believes anything they say.
Case in point above. One says Icy, the other says Fiery.
Last time I checked, those are opposites. The call can't be both.
zigackly.
"I don't really know what claim Denmark has to it" If he doesn't know that then either he is as dumb as a box of rocks, appalling misinformed or a liar. Which one is it?
Option 4. He was trolling. You know something about trolling. Amiright?
We only get your choices? Maybe it was rhetorical. Maybe a figure-of-speech. Maybe it's Maybelline. Maybe he phrased it that way to get a certain reaction from Danes and dummies.
u/#spitcoffee
About the only countries that could feasibly support an expeditionary force in that lineup is France. And possibly the U.K.
Germany logistically can’t without outside assistance
And the one time they collectively tried to conduct a bombing campaign without American logistics. They ran out of ordnance after about 24 hours of sustained operation
There won't be any military response, because neither side would benefit from such pointless war. and with nukes we'd all lose.
Economic warfare is a more likely outcome. EU and China controls the worlds shipping, with Mærsk being one of the largest shippers. If they all sanction the US, it'll be two weeks or so until the entire country is crippled from broken supply chains.
Remember the plandemic, were all they did was to impose some "green" policy forcing ships to go slower to save fuel and it almost crippled the US, just by a small slowdown in the supply chains.
Germany are not allowed to mount any campaign outside their borders, its the same with Japan.
I don't think any of them could.
I still can't tell if Trump is serious about Greenland or just positioning.
If France or the UK sent forces to stop the US, a NATO ally and #1 funder of NATO's defense, and Trump actually wanted Greenland, there are billions or perhaps trillions of ways that Trump could get what he wants without France or the UK doing anything at all about it, let alone send expeditionary forces to stop the US of all countries.
If China or Russia were making a move (much closer than I think people realize), then I could see France or the UK putting on a "show force" to act like they could do anything at all.
Remember what happened with Ukraine and EU involvement?
This is scene II.
EU will lose out. Just like in Ukraine.
Ukraine was initially about LNG reserves. EU has no LNG reserves of its own, except in the Leviathan Basin.
Now it is about much more natural resources.
They seem to have forgotten this already...
u/#trumpnato