He's a total fraud. He took all the research by Jon Harold (Patel Patriot) on the devolution series, and then rehashed it and passed it off on his own.
He paints himself as an ultra significant person, based on crap and nonsense. (Look at his self-described "first person in history to have two top songs on the billboard charts" nonsense).
Totally latched on to and went into cahoots with the fraud, Pascal Najadi.
After doing a dig on Johnson, in various dimensions, it became clear as day to me that he's another one of the fraudsters who latch on the Awakening Movement to get attention, self-inflate or cash in via followers.
FWIWI, he twists the conclusions of Harold's very solid research.
wow. people are not allowed to delve into a subject if someone else did it first? What a strange attitude! Of course the subject is going to sound the same.
people are not allowed to delve into a subject if someone else did it first?
Who said that?
Johnson is a fraud who claimed credit and who passed someone else's work off as his own. When Patel Patriot asked him about this, he blocked him.
It's completely proper and appropriate to build on someone else's foundation. We ALL do that (well, those of us who build), but its also proper and appropriate to recognize and acknowledge someone else's work when we cite it or use it, and to not pretend that we ourselves built it.
When people refuse to acknowledge the source when they take from others, the question of motive comes into play. Which is what inspired me to dig on Johnson.
Big egocentric fraud. My opinion. Based on reviewing his presence on the web.
Either way, please don't misconstrue my views or position by projecting such a fake and flimsy position as "people are not allowed to delve into a subject..."
I'll openly disavow such a statement.
I've seen enough of your posts and comments that I feel confident that you aren't trying to misrepresent me or win rhetorical points, so all I want to do here is to set the record straight.
FWIW, Patel Patriot has many times, which discussing his Devolution research, recognized that Thomas Wictor was the first person to discuss the idea of Devolution and then Jon went on to build on that.
To me, that speaks volumes. Just as Johnson's fundamental assertion that he is the instrument for "disclosing" important and secretly sourced information. (Not withstanding that of course, he cites and references all the publicly available documentation that Patel Patriot uncovered and brought to light in his Devolution Series.)
Maybe Johnson has changed his tune; my last digs on him was well more than a year ago. But personally, I doubt it.
Yes, that's true. Majic Eyes Only did the preeminent research on the LoW manural, imo.
That said, I think it hard to pin down exactly how of his research applies. Quite a different dimension of work from the CoG and Devo stuff.
I've read a good number of posts by frogs on the LoW manual, read through the relevant articles (e.g. Chapter 11) myself, and personally, I'm not convinced as to how much it really applies. But that's just me. Conclusion (for me): Jury out. Waiting for more data.
That said, if someone wants to listen to an audio reading that Johnson has published, I mean, go for it.
He's a total fraud. He took all the research by Jon Harold (Patel Patriot) on the devolution series, and then rehashed it and passed it off on his own.
He paints himself as an ultra significant person, based on crap and nonsense. (Look at his self-described "first person in history to have two top songs on the billboard charts" nonsense).
Totally latched on to and went into cahoots with the fraud, Pascal Najadi.
(See ICYMI: The CURIOUS CASE of Pascal Najadi: https://greatawakening.win/p/17shvo09gf/the-curious-case-of-pascal-najad/)
After doing a dig on Johnson, in various dimensions, it became clear as day to me that he's another one of the fraudsters who latch on the Awakening Movement to get attention, self-inflate or cash in via followers.
FWIWI, he twists the conclusions of Harold's very solid research.
https://patelpatriot.substack.com/?utm_source=substack&utm_medium=web&utm_campaign=substack_profile
Holy crap...
After reading all that, I ultimately ended on a high note
Kek, Classic and a little 1940-ish, but I love it.
wow. people are not allowed to delve into a subject if someone else did it first? What a strange attitude! Of course the subject is going to sound the same.
Who said that?
Johnson is a fraud who claimed credit and who passed someone else's work off as his own. When Patel Patriot asked him about this, he blocked him.
It's completely proper and appropriate to build on someone else's foundation. We ALL do that (well, those of us who build), but its also proper and appropriate to recognize and acknowledge someone else's work when we cite it or use it, and to not pretend that we ourselves built it.
When people refuse to acknowledge the source when they take from others, the question of motive comes into play. Which is what inspired me to dig on Johnson.
Big egocentric fraud. My opinion. Based on reviewing his presence on the web.
Either way, please don't misconstrue my views or position by projecting such a fake and flimsy position as "people are not allowed to delve into a subject..."
I'll openly disavow such a statement.
I've seen enough of your posts and comments that I feel confident that you aren't trying to misrepresent me or win rhetorical points, so all I want to do here is to set the record straight.
FWIW, Patel Patriot has many times, which discussing his Devolution research, recognized that Thomas Wictor was the first person to discuss the idea of Devolution and then Jon went on to build on that.
To me, that speaks volumes. Just as Johnson's fundamental assertion that he is the instrument for "disclosing" important and secretly sourced information. (Not withstanding that of course, he cites and references all the publicly available documentation that Patel Patriot uncovered and brought to light in his Devolution Series.)
Maybe Johnson has changed his tune; my last digs on him was well more than a year ago. But personally, I doubt it.
the source is the DoD manual. Just saying.
Yes, that's true. Majic Eyes Only did the preeminent research on the LoW manural, imo.
That said, I think it hard to pin down exactly how of his research applies. Quite a different dimension of work from the CoG and Devo stuff.
I've read a good number of posts by frogs on the LoW manual, read through the relevant articles (e.g. Chapter 11) myself, and personally, I'm not convinced as to how much it really applies. But that's just me. Conclusion (for me): Jury out. Waiting for more data.
That said, if someone wants to listen to an audio reading that Johnson has published, I mean, go for it.