As someone who has spent a considerable portion of his free time researching the UFO / Non-human intelligence phenomenon over the past 30 years (and over 120 books of reference material), the kindest way I can describe my feelings towards Wilcock is the word "dubious".
He has a history of making sweeping statements with little to no explanation or attribution. It's a serious red flag for me whenever someone in this field proclaims something or multiple things to be "true". This phenomenon is so complex & evolving that most intellectually honest researchers have more questions now than they did 30 years ago. There are things we think might be true... maybe. But there is next to nothing we can say is empirically true for certain.
Wilcock has a history of taking the research of others and using it without attribution.
But the most damning element for me when it comes to Wilcock is his years-long partnership with Corey Goode. If there has been a more transparent money-grab in the history of Ufology than the "Sphere Being Alliance" mythology and marketing machine, I do not know what it would be.
OP, I appreciate people posting this subject on GAW as even the doubters will realize over the next decade that understanding this phenomenon is an intrinsic key to understanding the current power structure on this planet and the history of civilization. So I thank you for that.
But I have deep concerns about Wilcock and his legitimacy.
The best person to listen to when it comes to UFO stuff is Richard Dolan. He is a historian that got caught up in the UFO / secret space program subject by studying the black budget world.
I like Salla though he makes some very big claims that he doesn't back up. I like him, he has a solid background and I think he means well. But I do take what he says with a small pinch of salt.
As DankHank mentioned, Richard Dolan is an excellent resource to check out. He's a historian by education and he's taken that meticulous approach to covering the subject.
The first two volumes of "UFO's and the National Security State" are UFO bibles for the nuts and bolts crowd. He's stated that he's working on the third but the books are incredibly large and detailed with thousands of footnotes and citations. Excellent stuff.
Dolan has expanded his view quite a bit beyond the nuts and bolts world in the past several years. I view his measured, logical and meticulous voice as invaluable to the field.
He's extremely different from Dolan, but I've found myself caught up in the research of a new guy on the scene, Nathaniel Gillis. He's coming at things from a radically different direction. His current tentative hypothesis is that "spirit guides", demonic possession, channeled entities and at least some "aliens" are all one in the same phenomenon, just simply different facets. He does not preclude the possibility that there are other ET groups separate from the more broad phenomenon.
It's an incredibly edgy theory and I must say, Gillis has really challenged me intellectually with his ideas. There are elements of his theory that do resonate with me.
There's a TON of interviews with both men on YouTube and There are hundreds of hours of intriguing consent.
I can understand what you're talking about. He has been through a lot of drama with the whole UFO/"new age"/paranormal community for the last 25 years. Contrary to what you said though, I actually see him constantly giving credit to the scientists and authors that he quotes or references. The reason i posted this is because David's recent live streams have been choke full of the best non-fake news and straight forward/simple Q proofs. His presentation is done in a way that is very friendly for the recently red pilled. Shadow of Ezra is his bread and butter among other accounts that are widely respected on this site and the awake/truther community at large. He even made a comment during his last stream about anons being careful and not default trusting sites like real raw news, etc (a classic conversation on here) which is is great for the up and coming diggers to think about...David has a killer digging level. Covers the whole gambit of diverse topics which a strong focus on the drops, breaking news and how they are connected.
I've heard a bit of what you're saying here from a few other people, PM. I'm glad to hear that he's reinvented himself because what you're describing is a much more honorable persona than the one he maintained when he was tied at the hip to Goode.
Going to be very difficult for me to get past his alliance with Goode but very happy to hear that he's providing valuable information again.
I think the whole Goode thing was a deep-state setup to discredit the truther/UFO movement... He was either a plant or everything he said was true and the cabal forced him to say he made it all up in a court of law while they held his family/friends feet first in front of a wood chipper. Either way, it's a bummer.
I had the pleasure (nightmare) of sitting with an astrophysicist and looking through albums of pictures, and videos, of “beings” and crafts that were not comprehensible to most people. Who are they? Where are they from? What are they? Why are they here? When did they get here? Inquiring minds want to know.
O.o would love to hear more Verum, if you're up for sharing.
I've been fortunate enough to have a few peeks behind the curtain and it sounds like you had a good one. I'd love to hear more if you're able to share.
I wish I could. The scientist was a client several years ago and “fate” had me in his office. I can say he had been on several TV shows that everyone has heard of. We had a common “connection” when I told him I have had an interest for 40+ years after my grandmother, with a car full of nurses, pulled over their vehicle and watched a hovering craft for what felt like a few minutes. A total of 20-30 other people pulled off onto the highway shoulder and watched. Over 100 reports were filed at the neighboring towns sheriffs department. This occurred in the mid-60’s. I’ve always believed there is something out there….but where is “out there”?
Alex Jones was Masad. Doesn't change the fact that %99.9 percent of what he said was true. He was one of the best public sources of info 15 years ago. His personality was the psyop, in case you didnt notice, kek
It talks about a "rogue" faction with tech that is indistinguishable from reversed engineered UFO's. I am skeptical about all of the "whistleblowers" but still find Greer the most plausible or, at least, the most interesting. I am happy that he hasn't been "arkancided".
Not all aliens are "demons", some are "angels". Some are "demons" though and if you communicate with them (like Alister Crowly did) then you're probably gonna have a bad time and be super evil (like Alister Crowley was).
I have been listening to David for 20 years. His brain is storing a phenomenal amount of pertinent data. He talks about, and can do, woo woo I personally know of, so in a way we are two birds of a feather. Two odd ducks actually. And I am very aware of why some take him with a grain of salt.
But when he is right, is he ever.
David is an information junkie. His supporters love him like an eccentric friend, not like a cult leader. He absolutely does mean well. Everything he learns he tries to share. He does pick the brains of other researchers but he give credit. But anyone putting themselves out there on the internet and saying what they think, is going to be criticized to death.
Sorry to burst your bubble, but there is.
Top right pick with Steven Tyler. There's more with him in the water next to Epstein and I think Obama, can't find that pic anymore.
oh, right, because that's definitely Epstein island, and anyone who has a picture with Tyler is on Epstein island... regardless, anyone can photoshop anyone to make them look like they were anywhere. This has been possible for over 20 years. Get a Grip.
Na, its one of the oldest tricks in the book dude. Libtards loved to say trump was on Epstein island since forever...I'll believe it when I see it.... Shills are out of ammo now. Good luck.
As someone who has spent a considerable portion of his free time researching the UFO / Non-human intelligence phenomenon over the past 30 years (and over 120 books of reference material), the kindest way I can describe my feelings towards Wilcock is the word "dubious".
He has a history of making sweeping statements with little to no explanation or attribution. It's a serious red flag for me whenever someone in this field proclaims something or multiple things to be "true". This phenomenon is so complex & evolving that most intellectually honest researchers have more questions now than they did 30 years ago. There are things we think might be true... maybe. But there is next to nothing we can say is empirically true for certain.
Wilcock has a history of taking the research of others and using it without attribution.
But the most damning element for me when it comes to Wilcock is his years-long partnership with Corey Goode. If there has been a more transparent money-grab in the history of Ufology than the "Sphere Being Alliance" mythology and marketing machine, I do not know what it would be.
OP, I appreciate people posting this subject on GAW as even the doubters will realize over the next decade that understanding this phenomenon is an intrinsic key to understanding the current power structure on this planet and the history of civilization. So I thank you for that.
But I have deep concerns about Wilcock and his legitimacy.
Regarding this subject matter, Exopolitics with Michael Salla seems sincere in discovering the truth, I've found. Your thoughts?
The best person to listen to when it comes to UFO stuff is Richard Dolan. He is a historian that got caught up in the UFO / secret space program subject by studying the black budget world.
Looked him up. Thanks.
I like Salla though he makes some very big claims that he doesn't back up. I like him, he has a solid background and I think he means well. But I do take what he says with a small pinch of salt.
As DankHank mentioned, Richard Dolan is an excellent resource to check out. He's a historian by education and he's taken that meticulous approach to covering the subject.
The first two volumes of "UFO's and the National Security State" are UFO bibles for the nuts and bolts crowd. He's stated that he's working on the third but the books are incredibly large and detailed with thousands of footnotes and citations. Excellent stuff.
Dolan has expanded his view quite a bit beyond the nuts and bolts world in the past several years. I view his measured, logical and meticulous voice as invaluable to the field.
He's extremely different from Dolan, but I've found myself caught up in the research of a new guy on the scene, Nathaniel Gillis. He's coming at things from a radically different direction. His current tentative hypothesis is that "spirit guides", demonic possession, channeled entities and at least some "aliens" are all one in the same phenomenon, just simply different facets. He does not preclude the possibility that there are other ET groups separate from the more broad phenomenon.
It's an incredibly edgy theory and I must say, Gillis has really challenged me intellectually with his ideas. There are elements of his theory that do resonate with me.
There's a TON of interviews with both men on YouTube and There are hundreds of hours of intriguing consent.
Thanks for your thoughtful answer, Jackie. I'll bookmark both names.
Couldn't agree more with your analysis. The Dark Journalist did a great expose on Corey Goode.
Goode was probably there to take make the subject of a secret space program look bad and to muddy the waters. Or it was all about money.
I can understand what you're talking about. He has been through a lot of drama with the whole UFO/"new age"/paranormal community for the last 25 years. Contrary to what you said though, I actually see him constantly giving credit to the scientists and authors that he quotes or references. The reason i posted this is because David's recent live streams have been choke full of the best non-fake news and straight forward/simple Q proofs. His presentation is done in a way that is very friendly for the recently red pilled. Shadow of Ezra is his bread and butter among other accounts that are widely respected on this site and the awake/truther community at large. He even made a comment during his last stream about anons being careful and not default trusting sites like real raw news, etc (a classic conversation on here) which is is great for the up and coming diggers to think about...David has a killer digging level. Covers the whole gambit of diverse topics which a strong focus on the drops, breaking news and how they are connected.
I've heard a bit of what you're saying here from a few other people, PM. I'm glad to hear that he's reinvented himself because what you're describing is a much more honorable persona than the one he maintained when he was tied at the hip to Goode.
Going to be very difficult for me to get past his alliance with Goode but very happy to hear that he's providing valuable information again.
I think the whole Goode thing was a deep-state setup to discredit the truther/UFO movement... He was either a plant or everything he said was true and the cabal forced him to say he made it all up in a court of law while they held his family/friends feet first in front of a wood chipper. Either way, it's a bummer.
I had the pleasure (nightmare) of sitting with an astrophysicist and looking through albums of pictures, and videos, of “beings” and crafts that were not comprehensible to most people. Who are they? Where are they from? What are they? Why are they here? When did they get here? Inquiring minds want to know.
O.o would love to hear more Verum, if you're up for sharing.
I've been fortunate enough to have a few peeks behind the curtain and it sounds like you had a good one. I'd love to hear more if you're able to share.
I wish I could. The scientist was a client several years ago and “fate” had me in his office. I can say he had been on several TV shows that everyone has heard of. We had a common “connection” when I told him I have had an interest for 40+ years after my grandmother, with a car full of nurses, pulled over their vehicle and watched a hovering craft for what felt like a few minutes. A total of 20-30 other people pulled off onto the highway shoulder and watched. Over 100 reports were filed at the neighboring towns sheriffs department. This occurred in the mid-60’s. I’ve always believed there is something out there….but where is “out there”?
Alex Jones was Masad. Doesn't change the fact that %99.9 percent of what he said was true. He was one of the best public sources of info 15 years ago. His personality was the psyop, in case you didnt notice, kek
So far, my favorite podcast is :
“BIGGER Than The Nuclear Bomb” - Dr. Steven Greer REVEALS Suppressed Energy Tech & Biden UFO Truths
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dvXz0ynCqJQ
It talks about a "rogue" faction with tech that is indistinguishable from reversed engineered UFO's. I am skeptical about all of the "whistleblowers" but still find Greer the most plausible or, at least, the most interesting. I am happy that he hasn't been "arkancided".
Dr. Greer & others say they communicate with 'aliens/demons' very dangerous.
Not all aliens are "demons", some are "angels". Some are "demons" though and if you communicate with them (like Alister Crowly did) then you're probably gonna have a bad time and be super evil (like Alister Crowley was).
I can't stand this guy. Seems griftish
My thoughts, too.
Sticky, with a request for a submission statement
Got it.
Put it in a reply to u/JackieDaytona74 (first comment)
I have been listening to David for 20 years. His brain is storing a phenomenal amount of pertinent data. He talks about, and can do, woo woo I personally know of, so in a way we are two birds of a feather. Two odd ducks actually. And I am very aware of why some take him with a grain of salt. But when he is right, is he ever.
David is an information junkie. His supporters love him like an eccentric friend, not like a cult leader. He absolutely does mean well. Everything he learns he tries to share. He does pick the brains of other researchers but he give credit. But anyone putting themselves out there on the internet and saying what they think, is going to be criticized to death.
bullshit
Sorry to burst your bubble, but there is. Top right pick with Steven Tyler. There's more with him in the water next to Epstein and I think Obama, can't find that pic anymore.
https://duckduckgo.com/?q=david+wilcock+Epstein+island&t=h_&iar=images&iax=images&ia=images&iai=https%3A%2F%2Fpbs.twimg.com%2Fmedia%2FEM-C8wfWkAQKQa5.jpg%3Alarge&pn=1
oh, right, because that's definitely Epstein island, and anyone who has a picture with Tyler is on Epstein island... regardless, anyone can photoshop anyone to make them look like they were anywhere. This has been possible for over 20 years. Get a Grip.
Lol...why so defensive. I'm just telling you what I've seen. There is a pic of him on Epstein island. Believe me if you want or not.
Na, its one of the oldest tricks in the book dude. Libtards loved to say trump was on Epstein island since forever...I'll believe it when I see it.... Shills are out of ammo now. Good luck.