Shittypedia has Patel as a 'Conspiracy Theorist' in their summary on him.
I get that Pedopedia can 1A slur patriots as 'conspiracy theorists' on a day to day level, but surely once you get into the realm of people getting senior Administration appointments and titles, they are veering towards Slander if they can't back it up with anything.
Shittypedia has Patel as a 'Conspiracy Theorist' in their summary on him.
I get that Pedopedia can 1A slur patriots as 'conspiracy theorists' on a day to day level, but surely once you get into the realm of people getting senior Administration appointments and titles, they are veering towards Slander if they can't back it up with anything.
pedia's defense is "we don't write the entries, it is open-source"
Oh I know but surely they must still have liability for it appearing on their platform...
"Open Source" more like Orders of Soros 🤣🤣
Except they locked out all the truly open source editors years ago.
It’s definitely curated now, but there’s still a ton of good info there, and someone other than theirs has some level of curation authority now.
Shittypedia can get sue.