"Musk also said that Bill Clinton, Bill Gates, and Reid Hoffman weren’t just visitors to Epstein’s island but clients—implying they were actively purchasing children."
Technically promises made promises kept; it was the first time the US government has 'officially' released anything on Epstein; and as for the 'goods'; how do you introduce evidence legally? CP is CP and that must be a massive legal dilemma and headache. Same as how the enemedia got away with Hunter laptop being 'disinformation'; some of us saw it and so know it, but it could never be presented to the 'masses' in a legal way.
Someone help me out here: Is it wise for investigators working on a RICO case to release all their evidence to public before issuing indictments? I know we all wanted everything made public when Biden was in charge in the vain hope of forcing DS prosecutors hands (vain indeed), but now that we’ve got our team in there isn’t the news we should be waiting for more along the indictment and arrest side of things than the disclosure side of things? Wouldn’t a judge who sees the prosecution give the public all the evidence they plan to use in a trial say that doing so inhibits the ability for a fair trial?
They did. And maybe it’s a problem. I don’t know yet. But it’s clear you can’t make everyone happy cause everyone values different things in different ways. Personally, I think we need to see a lot more people removed from the Deep State power structure before we hit the critical mass/inflection point where we can make our move and not find too much opposition. Let’s think about it a second: it seems to me that the moment they do release the epstein evidence (a lot more than flights logs let’s be honest), the arrests will need to happen…well…the night before, in order to not give these guys a chance to flee. And we still have TONS of violent illegals on the streets who could be terrorist sleeper cells waiting to be activated in that instance. All I know is, I still trust Trump implicitly. I trust the guys he brought in. I remember what Q said about how it all needs to be done correctly and legally and not according to the whims of anons who are only tangentially in the know. Q made a whole post about us holding our horses so to speak. Q knew we would be antsy and eager but I for one am as calm as a summer’s morning. Things are happening so fast right now I’m totally at peace that things are going as planned. If you want to keep holding their feet to the fire to do very specific things I don’t blame you, but I’m
too busy enjoying the show right now to worry about that personally.
"Musk also said that Bill Clinton, Bill Gates, and Reid Hoffman weren’t just visitors to Epstein’s island but clients—implying they were actively purchasing children."
https://video.twimg.com/ext_tw_video/1895667834656620544/pu/vid/avc1/882x486/p06kSeXEcpSj_4Mc.mp4
Technically promises made promises kept; it was the first time the US government has 'officially' released anything on Epstein; and as for the 'goods'; how do you introduce evidence legally? CP is CP and that must be a massive legal dilemma and headache. Same as how the enemedia got away with Hunter laptop being 'disinformation'; some of us saw it and so know it, but it could never be presented to the 'masses' in a legal way.
Someone help me out here: Is it wise for investigators working on a RICO case to release all their evidence to public before issuing indictments? I know we all wanted everything made public when Biden was in charge in the vain hope of forcing DS prosecutors hands (vain indeed), but now that we’ve got our team in there isn’t the news we should be waiting for more along the indictment and arrest side of things than the disclosure side of things? Wouldn’t a judge who sees the prosecution give the public all the evidence they plan to use in a trial say that doing so inhibits the ability for a fair trial?
They did say it would be released day 1.
If people can’t hold you to your word, then you might be another liar stringing people along for years with nothing. Remember Sean Hannity tick tock?
They did. And maybe it’s a problem. I don’t know yet. But it’s clear you can’t make everyone happy cause everyone values different things in different ways. Personally, I think we need to see a lot more people removed from the Deep State power structure before we hit the critical mass/inflection point where we can make our move and not find too much opposition. Let’s think about it a second: it seems to me that the moment they do release the epstein evidence (a lot more than flights logs let’s be honest), the arrests will need to happen…well…the night before, in order to not give these guys a chance to flee. And we still have TONS of violent illegals on the streets who could be terrorist sleeper cells waiting to be activated in that instance. All I know is, I still trust Trump implicitly. I trust the guys he brought in. I remember what Q said about how it all needs to be done correctly and legally and not according to the whims of anons who are only tangentially in the know. Q made a whole post about us holding our horses so to speak. Q knew we would be antsy and eager but I for one am as calm as a summer’s morning. Things are happening so fast right now I’m totally at peace that things are going as planned. If you want to keep holding their feet to the fire to do very specific things I don’t blame you, but I’m too busy enjoying the show right now to worry about that personally.
Anybody here really think that the shredders weren't working overtime for the last 4 years?
Yeah, really! They have had plenty of time to cover their tracks. Hopefully the good guys do actually, "Have it all"! We should know soon.
Joe Rogan Experience #2281 - Elon Musk https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sSOxPJD-VNo