I don’t understand what you’re saying. Why the web archive from 2019 is relevant? I know the Q post was from 2019, but what you’re trying to say regarding 2019 and webarchive?
If you mean that the current X banner look different - you probably couldn’t see it because of a cache or so. I can confirm - I see the same image now.
I think most of us read the OP as asserting that "Killary changed her X banner just one day ago, one day before the delta for the related Q drop, which has this image in the drop, but which isn't a screenshot of her (then) twitter account".
I randomly chose an archive from 2019, not because of the drop, but to show that there has been no recent change in her banner pic and that this current banner is actually very old.
Aka Killary did NOT change her X profile banner to the one quoted in Q drop #2917 one day before the delta.
Moreover, she did not change the banner just prior to or after the qdrop, either, as this (random) archive from January of 2019 shows (the drops 2917 and 2915 were in March 2019).
The current X banner looks no different to how it did in March 3 2019 or in January 2019, etc.
The premise of the post is completely wrong. Killary did not change her t-profile banner just before, during or after the Q drop quoting the image. This is easily verified as mistaken (aka debunked) in 5 minutes, so why did the OP not even bother to check if his/her Post headline assertion was correct or not before posting? And why did a mod even pin it?
There is no Q proof here, and a lot of frogs not bothering to read, verify etc, have just walked away with completely erroneous information about Q and any Q proofs. That's the very opposite of 'research'.
I don’t understand what you’re saying. Why the web archive from 2019 is relevant? I know the Q post was from 2019, but what you’re trying to say regarding 2019 and webarchive?
If you mean that the current X banner look different - you probably couldn’t see it because of a cache or so. I can confirm - I see the same image now.
I think most of us read the OP as asserting that "Killary changed her X banner just one day ago, one day before the delta for the related Q drop, which has this image in the drop, but which isn't a screenshot of her (then) twitter account".
I randomly chose an archive from 2019, not because of the drop, but to show that there has been no recent change in her banner pic and that this current banner is actually very old.
Aka Killary did NOT change her X profile banner to the one quoted in Q drop #2917 one day before the delta.
Moreover, she did not change the banner just prior to or after the qdrop, either, as this (random) archive from January of 2019 shows (the drops 2917 and 2915 were in March 2019).
https://web.archive.org/web/20190131232227/https://twitter.com/hillaryclinton
The current X banner looks no different to how it did in March 3 2019 or in January 2019, etc.
The premise of the post is completely wrong. Killary did not change her t-profile banner just before, during or after the Q drop quoting the image. This is easily verified as mistaken (aka debunked) in 5 minutes, so why did the OP not even bother to check if his/her Post headline assertion was correct or not before posting? And why did a mod even pin it?
There is no Q proof here, and a lot of frogs not bothering to read, verify etc, have just walked away with completely erroneous information about Q and any Q proofs. That's the very opposite of 'research'.