I was actually being serious. Now its bugging me more because you think I'm messing with people. I think it was "Keep Fighting" but I'm probably wrong and I burned out my X post views looking for it.
Sorry to hear you are bugged. I thought you were joking (but no, not messing with people).
Because the original story / premise is clearly wrong. Taking one specific thing and blowing that up into proof or even evidence of a hypothesis is a risky business.
That's why Q emphasized mathematical certainty, by highlighting instance after instance after instance after instance of Q 'proofs' etc. Not one or two.
Your biting sarcasm has been duly noted.
Carry on.
I was actually being serious. Now its bugging me more because you think I'm messing with people. I think it was "Keep Fighting" but I'm probably wrong and I burned out my X post views looking for it.
Sorry to hear you are bugged. I thought you were joking (but no, not messing with people).
Because the original story / premise is clearly wrong. Taking one specific thing and blowing that up into proof or even evidence of a hypothesis is a risky business.
That's why Q emphasized mathematical certainty, by highlighting instance after instance after instance after instance of Q 'proofs' etc. Not one or two.