No you are wrong I don’t care what you or anyone else does with their body. Don’t kill another human life for your convenience or circumstance. The babies body and life should not be the one who pays the price for your bad decisions or circumstances. Just because it’s a baby it’s not allowed to make decisions for its well being?
Every human being has a right to autonomy over their own body. This includes the baby inside a woman's womb. From the moment of conception, they are a living human being with a body - no matter how small. And as such they have full autonomy over their own body. No one - not even the mother - has the right to kill them and destroy their body.
TrumpTrollMaster
If you are pro-life, you are not allowing people to make medical decisions based on their own circumstance.
If you support mandatory vaccines, you are not allowing people to make medical decisions based on their own circumstance.
These two things are the same.
If you don't support mandatory vaccines, then you must also support abortion.
You’re inaccurately conflating the autonomy violation of vaccination mandates with abortion, which is not a question of personal autonomy, but a question of whether it is murder and/or assisted homocide, and how we should consider the realities of those situations, for each involved party, and in either direction.
It is possible to even be against abortion bans and still assert that there is an issue with using baby murder to supply medical tissue samples at an industrial scale.
There is NO reason to ever have an abortion beyond 3 months. In the case of actual medical emergency, there are other procedures. In the case of need to remove the baby early for its safety and/or the safety of the mother, we are currently able to successfully bring 5 month old gestating babies to term.
People who are concerned with the “rights” associated with abortion are usually strangely quiet, if not engaged in active attacks, some of them violent, against crisis pregnancy centers, and clinics that encourage unwed mothers to deliver their babies.
There is no natural right to murder your child in the womb.
Funding abortion clinics through taxation violates the moral sovereignty of everyone who disagrees morally with abortion, and abortion defenders know that and say nothing.
The violation of the promise that abortions would be “safe, legal, and rare” in order to get them accepted to begin with hasn’t even entered the story yet.
This isn’t even scratching the surface of how wrong your objections are.
There are many circumstances under which abortion is necessary.
Rape is one.
Passing a genetic disease on is one.
Knowing that it's fatal to the mother is also one.
YOUR opinion does not matter. If you can't force people to take vaccines then you can't force them to do anything with their body that they don't want.
By the way, just because what YOU think is right doesn't matter because plenty of people in the world grew up in a different religious setting or moral setting. What appears to be murder in the US is considered different in other countries.
You know what country doesn't allow abortions right now with the threat of death and punishment?
China.
So no. I don't support any agenda where any individual's body's choice is not theirs. If you want to call it "life at conception", you can. It's the same argument the communists use to force women to have children and keep them as slaves.
YOUR opinion does not matter. If you can't force people to take vaccines then you can't force them to do anything with their body that they don't want.
You can’t force a someone who commits a serious crime to go to prison if they don’t want. It’s their body, and you have no authority over it.
As I said, the argument is not over violations of autonomy, but over whether and/or in what regards it is murder, and how each involved party should be treated if so.
Further, as noted, this post was not reemphasized for its take on abortion, but on the industrialized harvesting of unborn children, which is inhuman, by any standard.
And my aggression here is because you have been aggressive, and are literally named “Troll”. I have no issue putting it aside if you wish to continue discussion, which,
just because what YOU think is right doesn't matter
If you are pro-life, you are not allowing people to make medical decisions based on their own circumstance.
If you support mandatory vaccines, you are not allowing people to make medical decisions based on their own circumstance.
These two things are the same.
If you don't support mandatory vaccines, then you must also support abortion.
No you are wrong I don’t care what you or anyone else does with their body. Don’t kill another human life for your convenience or circumstance. The babies body and life should not be the one who pays the price for your bad decisions or circumstances. Just because it’s a baby it’s not allowed to make decisions for its well being?
Why is it your decision to prevent a woman's choice to abort if it ruins her life?
Every human being has a right to autonomy over their own body. This includes the baby inside a woman's womb. From the moment of conception, they are a living human being with a body - no matter how small. And as such they have full autonomy over their own body. No one - not even the mother - has the right to kill them and destroy their body.
What gives you the right to tell what the mother can do with her body then?
This isn’t even scratching the surface of how wrong your objections are.
u/Retaining_H2O u/Magatony u/YeshuaSupreme
There are many circumstances under which abortion is necessary.
Rape is one. Passing a genetic disease on is one. Knowing that it's fatal to the mother is also one.
YOUR opinion does not matter. If you can't force people to take vaccines then you can't force them to do anything with their body that they don't want.
By the way, just because what YOU think is right doesn't matter because plenty of people in the world grew up in a different religious setting or moral setting. What appears to be murder in the US is considered different in other countries.
You know what country doesn't allow abortions right now with the threat of death and punishment?
China.
So no. I don't support any agenda where any individual's body's choice is not theirs. If you want to call it "life at conception", you can. It's the same argument the communists use to force women to have children and keep them as slaves.
You can’t force a someone who commits a serious crime to go to prison if they don’t want. It’s their body, and you have no authority over it.
As I said, the argument is not over violations of autonomy, but over whether and/or in what regards it is murder, and how each involved party should be treated if so.
Further, as noted, this post was not reemphasized for its take on abortion, but on the industrialized harvesting of unborn children, which is inhuman, by any standard.
https://greatawakening.win/p/19AduZ2lu4/x/c/4eRSNqhLVlE
And my aggression here is because you have been aggressive, and are literally named “Troll”. I have no issue putting it aside if you wish to continue discussion, which,
would be a bad start toward.